Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
On this page
IntuitionHow it worksWhen to use itStrengths & limitationsCommon pitfalls🔒 Read the full methodSourcesRelated methods
Cite this pageSpotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →
Home›Decision-making›Spherical Fuzzy Z-Number MARCOS Ranking
MCDMDistanceSpherical fuzzy z number

Spherical Fuzzy Z-Number MARCOS Ranking

SFZN-MARCOS (Spherical Fuzzy Z-Number MARCOS Ranking) is a distance multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Niu, J. in 2024. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.

ScholarGate
  1. MCDM
  2. v1
  3. 1 Sources
  4. PUBLISHED
Cite this page →
Tools & resources
Download slides
Learn & explore

Read the full method

Members only

Sign in with a free account to read this section.

Sign in

Method map

The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.

SFZN-MARCOS
SFZN-CRITIC

When to use it

Output ranks alternatives by F(U_i) ∈ [0, 1] (MARCOS utility function combining utility to ideal and anti-ideal). Best alternative has highest F(U). MARCOS differs from TOPSIS by constructing an EXTENDED decision matrix that explicitly includes anti-ideal and ideal rows, then computing utility degrees relative to these extended-matrix anchors. The canonical Stević 2020 utility function F(U) = (U+ + U-)/(1 + (1-F(U+))/F(U+) + (1-F(U-))/F(U-)) combines both utilities. SFZN reliability (τ_ε, τ_ν, τ_∂) modulates each component via the (component × reliability) Euclidean distance in Step 6, then co

Strengths & limitations

Strengths
  • Follows a transparent, reproducible computational procedure that can be audited step by step.
  • Handles multiple criteria of differing scales and units within a single decision matrix.
Limitations
  • Assumes full compensation — a strong score on one criterion can offset a weak score on another.

Sources

  1. Niu, J. (2024). Spherical Fuzzy Z-Numbers-based CRITIC CRADIAS and MARCOS Approaches for Evaluating English Teacher Performance. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications (IJACSA) DOI: 10.14569/ijacsa.2024.01503115 ↗

How to cite this page

ScholarGate. (2026, June 2). Spherical Fuzzy Z-Number MARCOS Ranking. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/decision-making/sfzn-marcos

Related methods

SFZN-CRITIC

Which method?

Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.

  • SFZN-CRITICDecision-making↔ compare
Compare side by side →

Referenced by

SFZN-CRITIC

Similar methods

SFZN-CRADISSFZN-CRITICCFZN-MARCOSMARCOSBF-MARCOSSF-MARCOSN-MARCOSHF-MARCOS

Related reference concepts

Decision MakingDecision Support SystemsEvaluation CriteriaCriteria for Decision-Making under Risk and UncertaintyQuantitative and MathematicalWeighted Scores

Spotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →

ScholarGate — SFZN-MARCOS (Spherical Fuzzy Z-Number MARCOS Ranking). Retrieved 2026-07-21 from https://scholargate.app/en/decision-making/sfzn-marcos · Dataset: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026
Quick facts
Originator
Niu, J.
Subfamily
Distance
Year
2024
Type
Compromise ranking via extended-matrix utility degrees relative to anti-ideal and ideal anchors under spherical Z-number uncertainty
Value Space
Spherical fuzzy z number
Uncertainty
hybrid
Compensation
full
Related methods
SFZN-CRITIC
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account