Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
On this page
IntuitionHow it worksWhen to use itStrengths & limitationsCommon pitfalls🔒 Read the full methodSourcesRelated methods
Cite this pageSpotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →
Home›Decision-making›Hesitant Fuzzy MARCOS
MCDMRankinghesitant

Hesitant Fuzzy MARCOS

HF-MARCOS (Hesitant Fuzzy MARCOS) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Li, G., Geng, X., Yuan, Y. in 2020 crisp; 2023 variant applicator. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.

ScholarGate
  1. MCDM
  2. v1
  3. 1 Sources
  4. PUBLISHED
Cite this page →
Tools & resources
Download slides
Learn & explore

Read the full method

Members only

Sign in with a free account to read this section.

Sign in

Method map

The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.

HF-MARCOS
AHPANPBWMBWM-BAYESIANCCSDCILOSCIMASCRITIC

When to use it

HF-MARCOS extends crisp MARCOS (Stević 2020) to hesitant fuzzy data. Each cell is an HFE — a finite set of membership degrees in [0,1] representing multiple expert assessments or hesitation. Group decisions are aggregated cell-wise via HFWA (Xia-Xu 2011) before the MARCOS pipeline. HFEs are then collapsed to crisp scores via mean (default) prior to AI/AAI construction. The compromise utility f(K_i) balances proximity to ideal and distance from anti-ideal; higher is better.

Strengths & limitations

Strengths
  • Follows a transparent, reproducible computational procedure that can be audited step by step.
  • Handles multiple criteria of differing scales and units within a single decision matrix.
Limitations
  • May exhibit rank reversal when alternatives are added to or removed from the set.
  • Assumes full compensation — a strong score on one criterion can offset a weak score on another.

Sources

  1. Li, G., Geng, X., Yuan, Y. (2023). An integrated MCDM method based on hesitant fuzzy MARCOS for supplier evaluation under sustainability requirements. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems link ↗

How to cite this page

ScholarGate. (2026, June 2). Hesitant Fuzzy MARCOS. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/decision-making/hf-marcos

Related methods

AHPANPBWMBWM-BAYESIANCCSDCILOSCIMASCRITIC

Which method?

Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.

  • AHPDecision-making↔ compare
  • ANPDecision-making↔ compare
  • BWMDecision-making↔ compare
  • BWM-BAYESIANDecision-making↔ compare
  • CCSDDecision-making↔ compare
  • CILOSDecision-making↔ compare
  • CIMASDecision-making↔ compare
  • CRITICDecision-making↔ compare
Compare side by side →

Similar methods

BF-MARCOSMARCOSPL-MARCOSROUGH-MARCOSGREY-MARCOSHF-VIKORSFZN-MARCOSQR-MARCOS

Related reference concepts

Decision MakingDecision Support SystemsDecision Making SkillsCriteria for Decision-Making under Risk and UncertaintyEvaluation CriteriaWeighted Scores

Spotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →

ScholarGate — HF-MARCOS (Hesitant Fuzzy MARCOS). Retrieved 2026-07-20 from https://scholargate.app/en/decision-making/hf-marcos · Dataset: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026
Quick facts
Originator
Li, G., Geng, X., Yuan, Y.
Subfamily
Ranking
Year
2020 crisp; 2023 variant applicator
Type
Hesitant Fuzzy compromise ranking — MARCOS extended via Hesitant Fuzzy Elements (HFE)
Value Space
hesitant
Uncertainty
epistemic
Compensation
full
Rank Reversal
Yes
Related methods
AHPANPBWMBWM-BAYESIANCCSDCILOSCIMASCRITIC
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account