Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
On this page
IntuitionHow it worksWhen to use itStrengths & limitationsCommon pitfalls🔒 Read the full methodSourcesRelated methods
Cite this pageSpotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →
Home›Decision-making›Neutrosophic extension of RAWEC
MCDMRankingTriangular neutrosophic

Neutrosophic extension of RAWEC

N-RAWEC (Neutrosophic extension of RAWEC) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Mohamed, Mai; Salam, Amira; Ye, Jun (2024) — SVTrN variant. Crisp RAWEC: Puška et al. 2024. No SVNN RAWEC paper confirmed. in 2024. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.

ScholarGate
  1. MCDM
  2. v1
  3. 1 Sources
  4. PUBLISHED
Cite this page →
Tools & resources
Download slides
Learn & explore

Read the full method

Members only

Sign in with a free account to read this section.

Sign in

Method map

The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.

N-RAWEC
AHPANPBWMBWM-BAYESIANCCSDCILOSCIMASCRITIC

When to use it

n-rawec extends RAWEC to handle Neutrosophic uncertainty. All arithmetic operations (normalisation, weighting, distance computation) are performed using Single-Valued Neutrosophic Set (SVNS: T, I, F; T,I,F ∈ [0,1], T+I+F ≤ 3) algebra. The final scores are defuzzified via score function S = (T − F + 1)/2 before ranking.

Strengths & limitations

Strengths
  • Follows a transparent, reproducible computational procedure that can be audited step by step.
  • Handles multiple criteria of differing scales and units within a single decision matrix.
Limitations
  • Assumes full compensation — a strong score on one criterion can offset a weak score on another.

Sources

  1. Mohamed, Mai, Salam, Amira, Ye, Jun (2024). Selection of Sustainable Material for the Construction of Drone Aerodynamic Wing using Neutrosophic RAWEC. Systems Assessment and Engineering Management DOI: 10.61356/j.saem.2024.1295 ↗

How to cite this page

ScholarGate. (2026, June 2). Neutrosophic extension of RAWEC. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/decision-making/n-rawec

Related methods

AHPANPBWMBWM-BAYESIANCCSDCILOSCIMASCRITIC

Which method?

Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.

  • AHPDecision-making↔ compare
  • ANPDecision-making↔ compare
  • BWMDecision-making↔ compare
  • BWM-BAYESIANDecision-making↔ compare
  • CCSDDecision-making↔ compare
  • CILOSDecision-making↔ compare
  • CIMASDecision-making↔ compare
  • CRITICDecision-making↔ compare
Compare side by side →

Similar methods

N-RAFSIP-RAWECN-MOORAN-PROMETHEEN-SPOTISFUZZY-RAWECN-COCOSON-AROMAN

Related reference concepts

Decision Support SystemsDecision MakingCriteria for Decision-Making under Risk and UncertaintyWeighted ScoresEvaluation CriteriaParticipative Decision Making

Spotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →

ScholarGate — N-RAWEC (Neutrosophic extension of RAWEC). Retrieved 2026-07-21 from https://scholargate.app/en/decision-making/n-rawec · Dataset: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026
Quick facts
Originator
Mohamed, Mai; Salam, Amira; Ye, Jun (2024) — SVTrN variant. Crisp RAWEC: Puška et al. 2024. No SVNN RAWEC paper confirmed.
Subfamily
Ranking
Year
2024
Type
Single-Valued Triangular Neutrosophic RAWEC — SVTrN ((l,m,u); T,I,F)
Value Space
Triangular neutrosophic
Uncertainty
hybrid
Compensation
full
Rank Reversal
No
Related methods
AHPANPBWMBWM-BAYESIANCCSDCILOSCIMASCRITIC
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account