Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
On this page
IntuitionHow it worksWhen to use itStrengths & limitationsCommon pitfalls🔒 Read the full methodSourcesRelated methods
Cite this pageSpotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →
Home›Decision-making›Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy TODIM (Krohling & Pacheco 2014)
MCDMRankingInterval intuitionistic

Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy TODIM (Krohling & Pacheco 2014)

IVIF-TODIM (Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy TODIM (Krohling & Pacheco 2014)) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Atanassov, K. T., Gargov, G. in 1989. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.

ScholarGate
  1. MCDM
  2. v1
  3. 1 Sources
  4. PUBLISHED
Cite this page →
Tools & resources
Download slides
Learn & explore

Read the full method

Members only

Sign in with a free account to read this section.

Sign in

Method map

The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.

IVIF-TODIM
AHPANPBWMCRITICENTROPYIF-ENTROPYMERECSWARA

When to use it

IVIF-TODIM extends Gomes-Lima 1992 prospect-theory TODIM to handle Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy uncertainty (Atanassov-Gargov 1989). All operations use IVIFN arithmetic. Each pairwise alternative comparison decomposes into gain (positive φ) or loss (negative φ scaled by 1/θ) per criterion via score-based ordering. Dominance δ(i,j) sums all partial contributions; total Σ_j δ(i,j) is normalized to [0,1] yielding global value ξ_i. Higher ξ = better. Loss-aversion parameter θ > 1 amplifies losses (prospect-theory loss aversion); θ = 1 is neutral.

Strengths & limitations

Strengths
  • Follows a transparent, reproducible computational procedure that can be audited step by step.
  • Handles multiple criteria of differing scales and units within a single decision matrix.
Limitations
  • May exhibit rank reversal when alternatives are added to or removed from the set.

Sources

  1. Atanassov, K. T., Gargov, G. (1989). Interval valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems DOI: 10.1016/0165-0114(89)90205-4 ↗

How to cite this page

ScholarGate. (2026, June 2). Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy TODIM (Krohling & Pacheco 2014). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/decision-making/ivif-todim

Related methods

AHPANPBWMCRITICENTROPYIF-ENTROPYMERECSWARA

Which method?

Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.

  • AHPDecision-making↔ compare
  • ANPDecision-making↔ compare
  • BWMDecision-making↔ compare
  • CRITICDecision-making↔ compare
  • ENTROPYDecision-making↔ compare
  • IF-ENTROPYDecision-making↔ compare
  • MERECDecision-making↔ compare
  • SWARADecision-making↔ compare
Compare side by side →

Similar methods

IF-TODIMIVIF-VIKORIVIF-MABACIVIF-ARASIF-TOPSISIVIF-COPRASIF-PROMETHEEIF-VIKOR

Related reference concepts

Decision MakingDecision Support SystemsWeighted ScoresDecision Theory and UtilityNewton-Raphson and Scoring MethodsCriteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty

Spotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →

ScholarGate — IVIF-TODIM (Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy TODIM (Krohling & Pacheco 2014)). Retrieved 2026-07-21 from https://scholargate.app/en/decision-making/ivif-todim · Dataset: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026
Quick facts
Originator
Atanassov, K. T., Gargov, G.
Subfamily
Ranking
Year
1989
Type
Prospect-theory dominance MCDM under Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy uncertainty (IVIFN: ([μ⁻,μ⁺],[ν⁻,ν⁺]); μ⁺+ν⁺ ≤ 1)
Value Space
Interval intuitionistic
Uncertainty
epistemic
Compensation
partial
Rank Reversal
Yes
Related methods
AHPANPBWMCRITICENTROPYIF-ENTROPYMERECSWARA
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account