Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
On this page
IntuitionHow it worksWhen to use itStrengths & limitationsCommon pitfalls🔒 Read the full methodSourcesRelated methods
Cite this pageSpotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →
Home›Decision-making›Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic AHP (HFLTS-envelope family: Yavuz 2015 + Özdağoğlu 2018)
MCDMWeight SubjectiveHesitant fuzzy linguistic

Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic AHP (HFLTS-envelope family: Yavuz 2015 + Özdağoğlu 2018)

HFL-AHP (Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic AHP (HFLTS-envelope family: Yavuz 2015 + Özdağoğlu 2018)) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Yavuz, M., Öztaysi, B., Çevik Onar, S., Kahraman, C. in 2015. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.

ScholarGate
  1. MCDM
  2. v1
  3. 1 Sources
  4. PUBLISHED
Cite this page →
Tools & resources
Download slides
Learn & explore

Read the full method

Members only

Sign in with a free account to read this section.

Sign in

Method map

The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.

HFL-AHP
AHPSORTARASCOBRACOCOSOCODASCOPRASEDASGRA

When to use it

Interval scores [a_i^-, a_i^+] describe the alternative's utility under pessimistic and optimistic readings of the same hesitant judgments. The preference-degree matrix P(A_i > A_j) ∈ [0,1] (with P(A_i>A_j) + P(A_j>A_i) = 1) compares two intervals; a round-robin majority on P gives the final ranking. Choose the 'preference_degree_yavuz' engine when intervals have non-zero width; the engine automatically falls back to midpoint comparison when all intervals collapse to points (degenerate-interval case).

Strengths & limitations

Strengths
  • Follows a transparent, reproducible computational procedure that can be audited step by step.
  • Handles multiple criteria of differing scales and units within a single decision matrix.
Limitations
  • May exhibit rank reversal when alternatives are added to or removed from the set.
  • Assumes full compensation — a strong score on one criterion can offset a weak score on another.

Sources

  1. Yavuz, M., Öztaysi, B., Çevik Onar, S., Kahraman, C. (2015). Multi-criteria evaluation of alternative-fuel vehicles via a hierarchical hesitant fuzzy linguistic model. Expert Systems with Applications DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2014.11.010 ↗

How to cite this page

ScholarGate. (2026, June 2). Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic AHP (HFLTS-envelope family: Yavuz 2015 + Özdağoğlu 2018). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/decision-making/hfl-ahp

Related methods

AHPSORTARASCOBRACOCOSOCODASCOPRASEDASGRA

Which method?

Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.

  • AHPSORTDecision-making↔ compare
  • ARASDecision-making↔ compare
  • COBRADecision-making↔ compare
  • COCOSODecision-making↔ compare
  • CODASDecision-making↔ compare
  • COPRASDecision-making↔ compare
  • EDASDecision-making↔ compare
  • GRADecision-making↔ compare
Compare side by side →

Similar methods

FUZZY-AHPHF-AHPHFL-CODASHFLPR-PRIORITYHFL-PROMETHEEHFL-MABACHF-TODIMHF-EDAS

Related reference concepts

Decision MakingDecision Support SystemsCriteria for Decision-Making under Risk and UncertaintyWeighted ScoresEvaluation CriteriaDecision Making Skills

Spotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →

ScholarGate — HFL-AHP (Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic AHP (HFLTS-envelope family: Yavuz 2015 + Özdağoğlu 2018)). Retrieved 2026-07-20 from https://scholargate.app/en/decision-making/hfl-ahp · Dataset: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026
Quick facts
Originator
Yavuz, M., Öztaysi, B., Çevik Onar, S., Kahraman, C.
Subfamily
Weight Subjective
Year
2015
Type
HFLTS-envelope pairwise comparison — interval/2-tuple aggregation — preference-degree (Yavuz) or defuzz (Özdağoğlu) ranking
Value Space
Hesitant fuzzy linguistic
Uncertainty
epistemic
Compensation
full
Rank Reversal
Yes
Related methods
AHPSORTARASCOBRACOCOSOCODASCOPRASEDASGRA
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account