Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
On this page
IntuitionHow it worksWhen to use itStrengths & limitationsCommon pitfalls🔒 Read the full methodSourcesRelated methods
Cite this pageSpotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →
Home›Decision-making›Hesitant Fuzzy EDAS (Evaluation Based on Distance from Average Solution)
MCDMRankingTriangular fuzzy hesitant

Hesitant Fuzzy EDAS (Evaluation Based on Distance from Average Solution)

HF-EDAS (Hesitant Fuzzy EDAS (Evaluation Based on Distance from Average Solution)) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Kutlu Gündoğdu, F.; Kahraman, C.; Civan, H. (HF-EDAS); Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M. et al. 2015 (base EDAS); Yu, D. 2014 (TFHFS value-space) in 2018. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.

ScholarGate
  1. MCDM
  2. v1
  3. 1 Sources
  4. PUBLISHED
Cite this page →
Tools & resources
Download slides
Learn & explore

Read the full method

Members only

Sign in with a free account to read this section.

Sign in

Method map

The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.

HF-EDAS
AHPANPBWMBWM-BAYESIANCCSDCILOSCIMASCRITIC

When to use it

HF-EDAS evaluates alternatives by their distance from the average solution under triangular fuzzy hesitant uncertainty. Higher Appraisal Score (AS ∈ [0,1]) indicates an alternative that exceeds the average in benefit criteria and stays below it in cost criteria. For group decisions, aggregate DM evaluations first via TFHFWA/TFHFWG with DM importance weights. Method 1 (defuzz-then-EDAS) is recommended for first-time users; Method 2 (fuzzy-throughout) preserves uncertainty granularity for sensitivity analysis.

Strengths & limitations

Strengths
  • Follows a transparent, reproducible computational procedure that can be audited step by step.
  • Handles multiple criteria of differing scales and units within a single decision matrix.
Limitations
  • May exhibit rank reversal when alternatives are added to or removed from the set.
  • Assumes full compensation — a strong score on one criterion can offset a weak score on another.

Sources

  1. Kutlu Gündoğdu, F., Kahraman, C., Civan, H. N. (2018). A novel hesitant fuzzy EDAS method and its application to hospital selection. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems DOI: 10.3233/JIFS-181172 ↗

How to cite this page

ScholarGate. (2026, June 2). Hesitant Fuzzy EDAS (Evaluation Based on Distance from Average Solution). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/decision-making/hf-edas

Related methods

AHPANPBWMBWM-BAYESIANCCSDCILOSCIMASCRITIC

Which method?

Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.

  • AHPDecision-making↔ compare
  • ANPDecision-making↔ compare
  • BWMDecision-making↔ compare
  • BWM-BAYESIANDecision-making↔ compare
  • CCSDDecision-making↔ compare
  • CILOSDecision-making↔ compare
  • CIMASDecision-making↔ compare
  • CRITICDecision-making↔ compare
Compare side by side →

Similar methods

EDASDHF-EDASHFL-CODASPHF-EDASHF-WASPASHF-CODASFUZZY-EDASHF-COPRAS

Related reference concepts

Decision Support SystemsDecision MakingWeighted ScoresEvaluation CriteriaDecision Making SkillsEvaluation

Spotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →

ScholarGate — HF-EDAS (Hesitant Fuzzy EDAS (Evaluation Based on Distance from Average Solution)). Retrieved 2026-07-21 from https://scholargate.app/en/decision-making/hf-edas · Dataset: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026
Quick facts
Originator
Kutlu Gündoğdu, F.; Kahraman, C.; Civan, H. (HF-EDAS); Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M. et al. 2015 (base EDAS); Yu, D. 2014 (TFHFS value-space)
Subfamily
Ranking
Year
2018
Type
Hesitant outranking/ranking — Triangular Fuzzy Hesitant Fuzzy Set (TFHFS, Yu 2014): each cell is a finite set of triangular fuzzy numbers in [0,1]^3
Value Space
Triangular fuzzy hesitant
Uncertainty
epistemic
Compensation
full
Rank Reversal
Yes
Related methods
AHPANPBWMBWM-BAYESIANCCSDCILOSCIMASCRITIC
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account