Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
On this page
IntuitionHow it worksWhen to use itStrengths & limitationsCommon pitfallsApplicationsFrequently asked🔒 Read the full methodSourcesRelated methods
Cite this pageSpotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →
Home›Decision-making›CRITIC-M
MCDMRanking

CRITIC-M

Criteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation - Modified (CRITIC-M) · Also known as: CRITIC-M, Modified CRITIC

CRITIC-M (Criteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation - Modified) is an objective weight derivation method that extends the classical CRITIC approach. It assigns weights to criteria based on two intrinsic properties of the decision matrix: variance (how much a criterion differentiates alternatives) and correlation (how much a criterion conflicts with or supplements others). Modified variants adjust the formulation to improve robustness or interpretability.

ScholarGate
  1. MCDM
  2. v1
  3. 2 Sources
  4. PUBLISHED
Cite this page →
Tools & resources
Download slides
Learn & explore

Read the full method

Members only

Sign in with a free account to read this section.

Sign in

Method map

The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.

CRITIC-M
CRITICMEREC-GSWARA II

When to use it

Use CRITIC-M when you want objective, data-driven criterion weights without expert elicitation. It is ideal for large decision matrices where patterns are evident in data, and when criteria independence or redundancy is important. Avoid it when data is sparse, when criteria are naturally correlated by design, or when expert judgment is critical to decision acceptance.

Strengths & limitations

Strengths
  • Fully objective; no subjective expert input required, reducing bias
  • Accounts for criterion diversity and discrimination power simultaneously
  • Computationally simple and efficient; applicable to large matrices
  • Data-driven approach provides empirical justification for weights
  • Identifies redundant criteria naturally; highly correlated criteria receive lower weights
Limitations
  • Assumes that variance reflects importance; in some contexts, stable criteria may be more important than variable ones
  • Correlation structure may be distorted by outliers; robust variants are needed for contaminated data
  • Does not account for preference direction; a criterion that varies but always performs poorly may still receive high weight
  • Weights can be unstable if data is sparse or if a few outliers dominate variance calculations

Frequently asked

Should I use CRITIC or CRITIC-M?

Original CRITIC uses max normalization; CRITIC-M variants may use vector normalization or other schemes. Vector normalization is more robust to scale differences. Run both and compare results; if they differ significantly, investigate the normalization scheme.

How do I handle missing values?

Impute missing values using domain knowledge or statistical methods (mean imputation, k-NN imputation). Alternatively, calculate variance and correlation only on complete cases. Perform sensitivity analysis to verify results are robust to imputation method.

Can CRITIC-M weights be negative?

No, conflict scores are always non-negative, so normalized weights are always non-negative. If a criterion has very low variance and very high correlation to others, it receives near-zero weight—often appropriately.

Sources

  1. Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., & Papayannakis, L. (1995). Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The CRITIC method. Computers & Operations Research, 22(7), 763-770. DOI: 10.1016/0305-0548(94)00059-H ↗
  2. Jahan, A., Mustapha, F., Sapuan, S. M., Ismail, M. Y., & Badruddin, I. A. (2012). A comprehensive VIKOR method for material selection. Materials & Design, 32(3), 1215-1221. DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2010.10.015 ↗

How to cite this page

ScholarGate. (2026, June 3). Criteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation - Modified (CRITIC-M). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/decision-making/critic-m

Related methods

CRITICMEREC-GSWARA II

Which method?

Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.

  • CRITICDecision-making↔ compare
  • MEREC-GDecision-making↔ compare
  • SWARA IIDecision-making↔ compare
Compare side by side →

Referenced by

MEREC-GSWARA II

Similar methods

CRITICMEREC-GSFZN-CRITICCCSDSD-WEIGHTSWARA IIIDOCRIWData-Driven MCDA

Related reference concepts

Decision Support SystemsMultidimensional ScalingQuadratic Discriminant AnalysisLinear Discriminant AnalysisWeighted ScoresPrincipal Component Analysis

Spotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →

ScholarGate — CRITIC-M (Criteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation - Modified (CRITIC-M)). Retrieved 2026-07-20 from https://scholargate.app/en/decision-making/critic-m · Dataset: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026
Quick facts
Originator
Based on Diakoulaki et al.'s CRITIC; modified variants developed later
Subfamily
Ranking
Year
1995
Type
Objective weight derivation via correlation and variance
Related methods
CRITICMEREC-GSWARA II
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account