Randomized Controlled Trial in Criminology
A randomized controlled trial (RCT) in criminology evaluates a justice intervention — such as hot-spots policing, a deterrence message, or a reentry program — by randomly assigning units (places, people, or cases) to receive the intervention or to serve as controls. Because assignment is by chance, treatment and control groups are statistically equivalent at baseline, so any later difference in crime or reoffending can be attributed to the intervention rather than to selection. Sherman and Weisburd's 1995 Minneapolis hot-spots patrol experiment helped establish the design as the gold standard of experimental criminology.
Read the full method
Sign in with a free account to read this section.
Method map
The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.
Sources
- Sherman, L. W., & Weisburd, D. (1995). General deterrent effects of police patrol in crime hot spots: A randomized, controlled trial. Justice Quarterly, 12(4), 625–648. DOI: 10.1080/07418829500096221 ↗
- Weisburd, D. (2003). Ethical practice and evaluation of interventions in crime and justice: The moral imperative for randomized trials. Evaluation Review, 27(3), 336–354. DOI: 10.1177/0193841X03027003007 ↗
How to cite this page
ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Randomized Controlled Trials in Criminal Justice Evaluation. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/criminology/randomized-controlled-trial-criminology
Which method?
Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.
- Crime Hot Spot AnalysisCriminology↔ compare
- Deterrence AnalysisCriminology↔ compare
- Propensity Weighting in CriminologyCriminology↔ compare
- Randomized Controlled TrialExperimental design↔ compare