Regression modelQuasi-experimental / causal inference

Policy Evaluation via Coarsened Exact Matching (CEM)

Coarsened Exact Matching (CEM) is a quasi-experimental causal-inference technique that creates balanced treatment and control groups from observational data by temporarily coarsening covariates into bins, exactly matching units within those bins, and then pruning unmatched observations before estimating policy effects. Introduced by Iacus, King, and Porro, CEM belongs to the monotonic imbalance bounding family of matching methods and is especially popular in policy evaluation.

Open in MethodMindSoonVideoSoon

Read the full method

Members only

Sign in with a free account to read this section.

Sign in

Sources

  1. Iacus, S. M., King, G., & Porro, G. (2012). Causal inference without balance checking: Coarsened exact matching. Political Analysis, 20(1), 1-24. DOI: 10.1093/pan/mpr013
  2. Iacus, S. M., King, G., & Porro, G. (2011). Multivariate matching methods that are monotonic imbalance bounding. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 106(493), 345-361. DOI: 10.1198/jasa.2011.tm09599

Related methods

ScholarGatePolicy Evaluation Coarsened Exact Matching (Coarsened Exact Matching for Policy Evaluation). Retrieved 2026-06-04 from https://scholargate.app/en/causal-inference/policy-evaluation-coarsened-exact-matching