SCImago Journal Rank
SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) Metric · Also known as: SJR, SCImago Journal Rank, Prestige-weighted impact
SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) is a prestige-weighted metric measuring journal citation impact based on Scopus data, developed by SCImago Group (a Spanish research consortium) in 2010. Unlike raw citation counts, SJR values citations from high-prestige journals more heavily than those from lower-prestige journals, similar to Google's PageRank algorithm. This prestige weighting approach accounts for field-specific citation cultures and provides fairer cross-discipline comparisons than raw impact factor. SJR is widely used for journal ranking, quality assessment, and publication targeting, complementing traditional Impact Factor with a prestige dimension.
Read the full method
Sign in with a free account to read this section.
Method map
The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.
When to use it
Use SJR when: (1) selecting appropriate journals for manuscript submission, comparing prestige of candidate journals within a field; (2) evaluating journal quality for literature review (higher-SJR journals more likely to publish influential research); (3) assessing research impact at journal level for benchmarking or institutional evaluation; (4) comparing journal prestige across disciplines using field-specific SJR percentile ranks rather than absolute values; (5) understanding citation influence in terms of prestige-weighted impact rather than raw citation counts; (6) conducting research evaluation when considering that high-prestige journal citations indicate stronger research influence.
Strengths & limitations
- Prestige-weighted approach: emphasizes citations from high-prestige sources, capturing quality-of-citation concept.
- Field-normalized implicitly: recursive calculation accounts for discipline-specific citation patterns without explicit adjustment.
- Cross-discipline comparison enabled: SJR percentile ranks (e.g., 'top 10% in field') enable fairer comparison across fields than raw values.
- PageRank algorithm: mathematically rigorous approach analogous to Google PageRank; reflects real-world principle that influential sources matter most.
- Resistant to gaming: harder to manipulate than raw Impact Factor; excessive self-citation reduces citing journal's prestige.
- Complements citation quantity: captures citation influence (prestige-weighted) alongside volume.
- Free access: SJR rankings available freely at scimagojr.com (unlike Impact Factor, which requires subscription).
- Complex calculation: prestige-weighting algorithm is non-transparent to non-specialists; difficult to understand and verify independently.
- Recursive dependency: SJR values depend on other journals' SJR values, creating interdependency; changing one journal's citations affects entire network.
- 3-year window: longer window than Impact Factor (2 years), making SJR slower to reflect recent trends.
- Scopus dependency: SJR relies exclusively on Scopus citation data; excludes citations in non-Scopus journals and databases.
- Field clustering: SJR values cluster by field naturally; some interpretation difficulty when comparing across very different disciplines.
- Prestige perpetuation: prestige-weighting can perpetuate advantage to already-prestigious journals, making it harder for emerging journals to gain influence.
- Limited citation context: does not distinguish positive from critical citations; counts all citations equally.
- Citation lag: updating occurs once yearly; cannot track real-time prestige changes.
Frequently asked
How is SJR different from Impact Factor?
Impact Factor (JIF): 2-year window, citation quantity only, simple calculation, published by Clarivate. SJR: 3-year window, prestige-weighted citations (citations from high-prestige journals count more), complex recursive algorithm, published freely by SCImago. JIF is transparent and widely recognized; SJR is prestige-weighted and field-aware. Use Impact Factor in WoS ecosystem, SJR in Scopus ecosystem. For cross-field comparison, SJR is fairer; for simplicity and transparency, JIF is preferable.
What are typical SJR ranges by field?
SJR values vary by field due to citation culture and field maturity: (1) Biomedical/Life Sciences: typical SJR 0.4–0.8 (high-citation field); (2) Chemistry/Physics: typical SJR 0.3–0.7 (moderate-to-high citations); (3) Mathematics: typical SJR 0.1–0.4 (low-citation field); (4) Social Sciences: typical SJR 0.2–0.6 (moderate citations); (5) Humanities: typical SJR 0.05–0.3 (very low citations). A SJR of 0.5 is excellent in mathematics, typical in biomedics. Always compare SJR within your field, not globally.
How do SJR and CiteScore relate?
SJR and CiteScore are complementary metrics both calculated from Scopus data: (1) CiteScore: 4-year window, citation quantity (average), easier to interpret; (2) SJR: 3-year window, prestige-weighted, harder to interpret. CiteScore focuses on citation volume; SJR focuses on prestige of citations. Both typically correlate (high-SJR journals usually have high CiteScore), but exceptions occur. Use CiteScore for journal impact volume; SJR for prestige-weighted influence. Elsevier recommends using both metrics together for comprehensive journal evaluation.
Can I use SJR to compare journals across different fields?
Direct SJR value comparison across fields is unreliable (e.g., SJR 0.5 in biology vs. 0.3 in mathematics). Instead, use SJR Percentile Rank (e.g., 'top 10% in field') or Rank Position ('1st in Neurology') for fair comparison. Alternatively, use journal quartiles (Q1–Q4 within subject area). This enables meaningful comparison: 'This researcher publishes predominantly in Q1 journals across multiple fields' is a fair assessment independent of absolute SJR values.
Is SJR susceptible to gaming like Impact Factor?
SJR is harder to game than Impact Factor, but not immune: (1) Excessive self-citation: inflates citation count but dilutes the citing journal's prestige (recursive effect), reducing advantage; (2) Citation cartels: coordinated mutual citation among journals has limited effect due to prestige-weighting (citations between low-prestige journals add little value). SJR is more robust than JIF against gaming, but editors should avoid practices like mandating journal self-citations or artificial editorial bias.
How often is SJR updated?
SJR is updated annually (typically in summer), with 1-year lag for data processing. The current SJR published reflects 3-year citation window (e.g., 2024 SJR includes citations 2021–2023). This annual update cycle is slower than CiteScore (updated continuously) or Impact Factor (updated annually but with slightly different lag). For real-time journal metrics, use CiteScore; for annual benchmarking, SJR is reliable.
Sources
- González-Pereira, B., Guerrero-Bote, V. P., & Moya-Anegón, F. (2010). The SJR indicator: A new indicator of journals' scientific prestige. Scientometrics, 82(2), 391-400. link ↗
- SCImago. (2024). SJR Rankings & Methodology. Retrieved from https://www.scimagojr.com/ link ↗
- Elsevier Scopus. (2023). CiteScore and SJR Comparison. Retrieved from https://blog.scopus.com/ link ↗
How to cite this page
ScholarGate. (2026, June 3). SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) Metric. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/bibliometrics/scimago-journal-rank
Which method?
Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.
- H-IndexBibliometrics↔ compare
- Journal Citation ReportsBibliometrics↔ compare
- Journal Impact FactorBibliometrics↔ compare
- Scopus DatabaseBibliometrics↔ compare
- Web of Science DatabaseBibliometrics↔ compare