ScholarGate
Assistent

Methoden vergleichen

Prüfen Sie die ausgewählten Methoden nebeneinander; abweichende Zeilen sind hervorgehoben.

Vertrauenswürdigkeitskriterien in der qualitativen Forschung×Methode des Tiefeninterviews×
FachgebietQualitative ForschungQualitative Forschung
FamilieProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Entstehungsjahr19851954
UrheberYvonna Lincoln and Egon GubaCarl Rogers and Herbert H. Hyman
TypFrameworkMethod
Wegweisende QuelleLincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. SAGE Publications. ISBN: 978-0803924314Kvale, S. (1996). InterViews: An Introduction to Qualitative Research Interviewing. SAGE Publications. ISBN: 978-0761908631
Aliasnamentrustworthiness criteria, credibility, dependability, confirmabilityIDI, qualitative interview, one-on-one interview, in-depth interviewing
Verwandt45
ZusammenfassungTrustworthiness is a framework for evaluating the quality and rigor of qualitative research, developed by Lincoln and Guba (1985) as an alternative to quantitative criteria (internal validity, external validity, reliability, objectivity). The framework comprises five criteria: credibility (findings are accurate and grounded in data), transferability (findings apply to other contexts), dependability (findings are consistent and defensible), confirmability (findings reflect the data and participants' perspectives, not researcher bias), and authenticity (research reflects diverse viewpoints and promotes understanding). This framework has become standard for assessing qualitative research across disciplines and guides researchers in designing and reporting rigorous qualitative studies.In-depth interviews are a qualitative research method in which a trained interviewer conducts one-on-one conversations with individual participants using open-ended questions to explore their experiences, perspectives, and understandings of a phenomenon. Developed in the 1950s by Rogers and Hyman, the method varies along a spectrum from structured (standardized question sets) to semi-structured (guided topic areas with flexibility) to unstructured (emergent, conversational). In-depth interviews are widely used in sociology, psychology, health sciences, anthropology, and organizational research to capture rich, detailed narratives and personal meaning.
ScholarGateDatensatz
  1. v1
  2. 4 Quellen
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 4 Quellen
  3. PUBLISHED

Zur Suche Folien herunterladen

ScholarGateMethoden vergleichen: Trustworthiness Criteria in Qualitative Research · In-Depth Interview Method. Abgerufen am 2026-06-18 von https://scholargate.app/de/compare