ScholarGate
Assistent

Methoden vergleichen

Prüfen Sie die ausgewählten Methoden nebeneinander; abweichende Zeilen sind hervorgehoben.

Pragmatische klinische Studie der Phase II×Phase-I-Klinikstudie×
FachgebietEpidemiologieEpidemiologie
FamilieProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
EntstehungsjahrPragmatic framework: 1967; Phase II application: 1990s–2000s1960s (formal regulatory framework established ~1963–1970s)
UrheberConceptual basis: Daniel Schwartz & Joseph Lellouch (pragmatic vs. explanatory distinction, 1967); applied to Phase II context by drug developers and trialists from the 1990s onwardRegulatory and clinical pharmacology community; formalized in U.S. FDA IND regulations (1963) and ICH guidelines
TypInterventional study designInterventional clinical study design
Wegweisende QuelleSchwartz, D., & Lellouch, J. (1967). Explanatory and pragmatic attitudes in therapeutical trials. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 20(8), 637–648. DOI ↗Storer, B. E. (1989). Design and analysis of phase I clinical trials. Biometrics, 45(3), 925–937. DOI ↗
Aliasnamenpragmatic Phase II trial, real-world Phase II trial, Phase II pragmatic RCT, Phase IIb pragmatic trialPhase 1 trial, first-in-human study, FIH study, dose-escalation study
Verwandt66
ZusammenfassungA pragmatic Phase II clinical trial is an early-to-mid-stage interventional study that evaluates a new treatment's preliminary efficacy and safety under conditions that approximate real-world clinical practice rather than tightly controlled experimental settings. It sits between pure explanatory Phase II trials and large pragmatic Phase III confirmatory trials, prioritising practical feasibility and clinical relevance while still generating the signal needed to justify further development.A Phase I clinical trial is the first stage of human testing for a new drug, biologic, or intervention. Its primary objective is to evaluate safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics (PD) rather than therapeutic efficacy. Small cohorts of participants — typically healthy volunteers or patients with advanced disease — receive sequentially increasing doses to identify the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) that define the boundary for subsequent trials.
ScholarGateDatensatz
  1. v1
  2. 2 Quellen
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Quellen
  3. PUBLISHED

Zur Suche Folien herunterladen

ScholarGateMethoden vergleichen: Pragmatic phase II clinical trial · Phase I Clinical Trial. Abgerufen am 2026-06-20 von https://scholargate.app/de/compare