ScholarGate
Assistent

Methoden vergleichen

Prüfen Sie die ausgewählten Methoden nebeneinander; abweichende Zeilen sind hervorgehoben.

KLM-GOMS×Cognitive Walkthrough×
FachgebietMensch-Computer-InteraktionMensch-Computer-Interaktion
FamilieHypothesis testHypothesis test
Entstehungsjahr19831990
UrheberStuart Card, Thomas Moran, Allen NewellClayton Lewis, Peter Polson, Cathleen Wharton, John Rieman
TypComputational cognitive model for task execution time predictionEvaluative walkthrough examining how users learn to use an interface
Wegweisende QuelleCard, S. K., Moran, T. P., & Newell, A. (1983). The Psychology of Human-Computer Interaction. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. ISBN: 0898592437Lewis, C., Polson, P. G., Wharton, C., & Rieman, J. (1990). Testing a walkthrough methodology for specifying and evaluating user interface designs. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 387–392). link ↗
AliasnamenGOMS Model, KLMCognitive Walkthrough, CW Analysis
Verwandt44
ZusammenfassungThe Keystroke-Level Model (KLM), part of the Goals-Operators-Methods-Selection rules (GOMS) framework, is a computational method for predicting how long a user will take to accomplish a routine task using an interactive system. Developed by Card, Moran, and Newell in 1983, KLM decomposes user actions into primitive operators (keystrokes, mouse clicks, mental preparation, system response waits) with empirically derived execution times, enabling designers to estimate task performance without running user studies.Cognitive Walkthrough is an inspection method for evaluating interface designs by simulating and analyzing how users will learn to use a system through exploration and trial. Developed by Clayton Lewis, Peter Polson, Cathleen Wharton, and John Rieman in 1990, this method is grounded in cognitive psychology and focuses specifically on learnability—whether first-time or occasional users can discover how to perform tasks without formal training. Evaluators role-play user actions, answer a set of critical questions about feedback and discovery at each step, and document usability problems.
ScholarGateDatensatz
  1. v1
  2. 2 Quellen
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Quellen
  3. PUBLISHED

Zur Suche Folien herunterladen

ScholarGateMethoden vergleichen: KLM-GOMS · Cognitive Walkthrough. Abgerufen am 2026-06-18 von https://scholargate.app/de/compare