Araştırma Yöntemleri

Leseweg

Die meistzitierten grundlegenden Methoden dieses Themas, in der Reihenfolge ihrer Entwicklung — ein Ausgangspunkt, wenn Sie hier neu sind.

1. I
   Vergleichende RechtsanalyseLate 19th century; formalised 1900von Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz (early conceptualisation); Raymond Saleilles and Édouard Lambert (modern discipline, 1900 Paris Congress)
2. II
   Rechtsinhaltsanalyse1940s–1970s (applied systematically to legal texts)von Interdisciplinary; foundational content analysis by Harold Lasswell (1940s); applied to legal texts by empirical legal scholars from the 1970s onward
3. III
   Vergleichende dogmatische Rechtsforschung19th century origins; modern systematic form 1960s–1998von Rooted in classical comparative law (Anselm von Feuerbach, early 19th c.); systematised by Zweigert & Kötz (1998)
4. IV
   Längsschnittliche vergleichende RechtsanalyseLate 20th century (comparative law foundational texts 1960s–1998; longitudinal integration from 1990s onward)von Konrad Zweigert and Hein Kotz (comparative law foundation); longitudinal dimension integrated in socio-legal and legal history scholarship
5. V
   Kritische FallrechtsanalyseLate 1970s–1980s (CLS conference 1977; Unger 1983)von Critical Legal Studies (CLS) movement; key figures include Duncan Kennedy, Roberto Unger, Mark Tushnet
6. VI
   Kritische dogmatische Rechtsforschung1970s–1980s (Critical Legal Studies movement; applied to doctrinal method from 1980s onward)von Synthesized from Traditional Doctrinal Legal Research and Critical Legal Studies (Roberto Unger, Duncan Kennedy, and others)
7. VII
   Evaluation-focused legal content analysisLate 20th century; evaluation-focused applications emerged prominently from the 1990s onwardvon Builds on Klaus Krippendorff's content analysis framework and legal scholarship traditions
8. VIII
   FallrechtanalyseMedieval English common law; academic formalisation 19th–20th centuryvon Common law tradition (England); systematised in Anglo-American jurisprudence