Motivated Reasoning Experiment
A motivated reasoning experiment tests whether people process political information to reach conclusions they are directionally motivated to hold rather than the most accurate ones. Building on Kunda's (1990) theory and crystallized by Taber and Lodge (2006), these designs expose partisans to attitude-congruent and incongruent arguments and measure biased assimilation, disconfirmation bias, attitude polarization, and selective exposure.
Læs hele metoden
Log ind med en gratis konto for at læse dette afsnit.
Metodekort
Nabolaget af beslægtede metoder — vælg en knude for at udforske.
Kilder
- Taber, C. S., & Lodge, M. (2006). Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 755-769. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00214.x ↗
- Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108(3), 480-498. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480 ↗
Sådan citerer du denne side
ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Motivated Political Reasoning Experiment. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/da/political-psychology/motivated-reasoning-experiment
Hvilken metode?
Stil denne metode ved siden af dens nærmeste slægtninge, og læs dem side om side — biblioteket lægger bøgerne på bordet; valget er dit.
- Affective Polarization MeasurementPolitisk psykologi↔ sammenlign
- Issue Framing ExperimentPolitisk psykologi↔ sammenlign
- Need for Closure ScalePolitisk psykologi↔ sammenlign
- PartisanskalaPolitisk psykologi↔ sammenlign
Refereret af
Lignende metoder
Relaterede referencebegreber
Har du fundet en fejl på denne side? Indberet den eller foreslå en rettelse →