Elite Cue Experiment
An elite cue experiment isolates the persuasive power of source endorsements by holding a policy message constant and randomly varying who is said to support it. Grounded in John Zaller's receive-accept-sample model of mass opinion, which holds that citizens take cues from trusted political elites rather than reasoning from first principles, the design reveals how much opinion moves simply because a party or leader takes a side. Stephen Nicholson's work on polarizing cues shows that in-party endorsements can persuade while out-party endorsements provoke backlash, making the cue, not the argument, the engine of opinion change.
Læs hele metoden
Log ind med en gratis konto for at læse dette afsnit.
Metodekort
Nabolaget af beslægtede metoder — vælg en knude for at udforske.
Kilder
- Zaller, J. R. (1992). The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 9780521407861
- Nicholson, S. P. (2012). Polarizing Cues. American Journal of Political Science, 56(1), 52-66. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00541.x ↗
Sådan citerer du denne side
ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Elite Cue Experiment (Party-Endorsement Persuasion Design). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/da/political-psychology/elite-cue-experiment
Hvilken metode?
Stil denne metode ved siden af dens nærmeste slægtninge, og læs dem side om side — biblioteket lægger bøgerne på bordet; valget er dit.
- Democratic Norms Support MeasurementPolitisk psykologi↔ sammenlign
- Issue Framing ExperimentPolitisk psykologi↔ sammenlign
- Partisan Motivated Reasoning ParadigmPolitisk psykologi↔ sammenlign
Refereret af
Lignende metoder
Har du fundet en fejl på denne side? Indberet den eller foreslå en rettelse →