ScholarGate
Assistent
Process / pipelineParticipatory monitoring and evaluation

Most Significant Change for Development

The Most Significant Change (MSC) technique is a participatory, story-based approach to monitoring and evaluating development programmes that dispenses with predefined indicators. Developed by Rick Davies and elaborated with Jess Dart in their widely used 2005 guide, it works by systematically collecting stories of significant change from those closest to a programme and then filtering and selecting the most significant of them through deliberative panels at successive levels of the organisational hierarchy. The result is a structured, dialogical account of what stakeholders themselves judge to be the most important outcomes of an intervention.

Åbn i MethodMindSnartAnvend, sammenlign, få vejledning
Værktøjer og ressourcer
Hent slides
Lær og udforsk
VideoSnart

Læs hele metoden

Kun for medlemmer

Log ind med en gratis konto for at læse dette afsnit.

Log ind

Metodekort

Nabolaget af beslægtede metoder — vælg en knude for at udforske.

Kilder

  1. Davies, R., & Dart, J. (2005). The 'Most Significant Change' (MSC) Technique: A Guide to Its Use. CARE International, Oxfam, et al. link
  2. Dart, J., & Davies, R. (2003). A Dialogical, Story-Based Evaluation Tool: The Most Significant Change Technique. American Journal of Evaluation, 24(2), 137-155. DOI: 10.1177/109821400302400202

Sådan citerer du denne side

ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Most Significant Change (MSC) Technique in Development. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/da/development-studies/most-significant-change-development

Hvilken metode?

Stil denne metode ved siden af dens nærmeste slægtninge, og læs dem side om side — biblioteket lægger bøgerne på bordet; valget er dit.

Sammenlign side om side

Refereret af

ScholarGateMost Significant Change for Development (Most Significant Change (MSC) Technique in Development). Hentet 2026-06-24 fra https://scholargate.app/da/development-studies/most-significant-change-development · Datasæt: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026