Sammenlign metoder
Gennemgå dine valgte metoder side om side; rækker, der afviger, er fremhævet.
| Vidensoverførsel× | Normaliseringsprocessteori (NPT)× | |
|---|---|---|
| Fagområde | Implementeringsforskning | Implementeringsforskning |
| Familie | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Oprindelsesår≠ | 2004 | 2006 |
| Ophavsperson≠ | Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) | May, C. R. |
| Type | Framework | Framework |
| Oprindelig kilde≠ | Canadian Institutes of Health Research. (2004). Knowledge Translation Strategy 2004-2009. CIHR, Ottawa. link ↗ | May, C. R. (2006). A rational model for assessing and evaluating complex interventions in health care. BMC Health Services Research, 6, 86. DOI ↗ |
| Aliasser | KT, evidence-to-practice, research-to-practice | NPT, normalization theory, routinization |
| Relaterede | 5 | 5 |
| Resumé≠ | Knowledge Translation (KT) is the systematic synthesis, dissemination, exchange, and application of research findings to improve health outcomes and healthcare practice. First formalized by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research in 2004, KT recognizes that evidence generation alone does not automatically change clinical or policy behaviour, and structures a purposeful process to bridge the gap between research and practice. | Normalization Process Theory (NPT) is a sociological framework developed by Carl May and colleagues to explain how new interventions become routinely embedded ('normalized') in organizational and clinical practice. Unlike efficiency-focused frameworks that measure adoption and fidelity, NPT explains the social processes through which interventions transition from external innovations to normal practice. NPT identifies four key mechanisms (Coherence, Cognitive Participation, Collective Action, Reflexive Monitoring) that collectively determine whether an intervention becomes 'the way we do things here' or remains a temporary project. |
| ScholarGateDatasæt ↗ |
|
|