Bureaucratic Reputation Analysis
Bureaucratic reputation analysis is an analytical framework for explaining the behaviour, power and autonomy of public agencies through the lens of their reputation — the set of symbolic beliefs about an agency's capacities, intentions and history held by its many audiences. Developed by Daniel Carpenter, notably in his 2001 study of how U.S. executive agencies forged autonomy, and elaborated with George Krause, the framework treats reputation as a strategic asset that agencies cultivate and protect. It distinguishes performative, moral, technical and procedural dimensions of reputation and traces how reputational concerns drive what agencies do.
Přečíst celou metodu
Pro přečtení této sekce se přihlaste s bezplatným účtem.
Mapa metod
Okolí příbuzných metod — vyberte uzel, který chcete prozkoumat.
Zdroje
- Carpenter, D. P. (2001). The Forging of Bureaucratic Autonomy: Reputations, Networks, and Policy Innovation in Executive Agencies, 1862–1928. Princeton: Princeton University Press. ISBN: 9780691070100
- Carpenter, D. P., & Krause, G. A. (2012). Reputation and Public Administration. Public Administration Review, 72(1), 26–32. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02506.x ↗
Jak citovat tuto stránku
ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Bureaucratic Reputation Analysis of Public Agencies. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/cs/public-administration/bureaucratic-reputation-analysis
Která metoda?
Postavte tuto metodu vedle jejích nejbližších příbuzných a čtěte je vedle sebe — knihovna položí knihy na stůl; volba je na vás.
- New Public Management AssessmentPublic Administration↔ porovnat
- Regulatory Enforcement AnalysisPublic Administration↔ porovnat
- Transparency IndexPublic Administration↔ porovnat
- Whole-of-Government AnalysisPublic Administration↔ porovnat
Odkazuje sem
Podobné metody
Našli jste na této stránce chybu? Nahlaste ji nebo navrhněte opravu →