ScholarGate
Asistent

Porovnat metody

Prohlédněte si vybrané metody vedle sebe; řádky, které se liší, jsou zvýrazněny.

Vážení na základě skóre sklonu (PSW / IPW)×Párování na základě skóre propensity×
OborKauzální inferenceStatistika ve výzkumu
RodinaRegression modelProcess / pipeline
Rok vzniku1983 (propensity score); 2003 (efficient IPW estimator)1983
TvůrceRosenbaum & Rubin (propensity score); Hirano, Imbens & Ridder (efficient weighting)Paul Rosenbaum and Donald Rubin
TypCausal inference / reweightingMethod
Původní zdrojRosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41-55. DOI ↗Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55. DOI ↗
Další názvyPSW, inverse probability weighting, IPW, propensity-based weightingPSM, propensity score weighting, covariate balance
Příbuzné63
ShrnutíPropensity score weighting is a causal-inference method that reweights observations so that the covariate distributions of treated and untreated units look exchangeable, enabling unbiased estimation of average treatment effects from observational data. Each unit receives a weight that is the inverse of its probability of receiving the treatment it actually received — a strategy formalised by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983) and given its efficient semiparametric form by Hirano, Imbens and Ridder (2003).Propensity score matching (PSM) is a method for reducing confounding bias in observational studies by balancing baseline characteristics between treatment groups, simulating randomization. Developed by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983), it estimates the probability of receiving treatment given observed covariates, then matches or weights treated and control individuals with similar treatment probabilities. Widely used in medicine, epidemiology, and policy evaluation when randomized trials are infeasible or unethical, enabling estimation of treatment effects while controlling for selection bias.
ScholarGateDatová sada
  1. v1
  2. 2 Zdroje
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Zdroje
  3. PUBLISHED

Přejít na hledání Stáhnout prezentaci

ScholarGatePorovnat metody: Propensity Score Weighting · Propensity Score Matching. Získáno 2026-06-18 z https://scholargate.app/cs/compare