ScholarGate
Asistent

Porovnat metody

Prohlédněte si vybrané metody vedle sebe; řádky, které se liší, jsou zvýrazněny.

Bayesovský ex post facto design×Párování na základě skóre propensity×
OborDesign výzkumuStatistika ve výzkumu
RodinaProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Rok vzniku1964 (Kerlinger ex post facto); Bayesian integration from 1990s–2000s onward1983
TvůrceFrederick N. Kerlinger (ex post facto framework); Bayesian extension draws on Laplace and modern Bayesian statisticsPaul Rosenbaum and Donald Rubin
TypQuantitative observational research design with Bayesian inferenceMethod
Původní zdrojKerlinger, F. N. (1973). Foundations of Behavioral Research (2nd ed.). Holt, Rinehart and Winston. link ↗Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55. DOI ↗
Další názvyBayesian causal-comparative design, Bayesian after-the-fact design, Bayesian observational causal design, Bayesian retrospective causal studyPSM, propensity score weighting, covariate balance
Příbuzné53
ShrnutíBayesian ex post facto design investigates possible causal relationships among variables that have already occurred, without researcher manipulation of those variables, and quantifies uncertainty about those relationships using Bayesian statistical inference. The researcher selects groups that differ on an outcome or a presumed cause after the fact, then uses prior knowledge and observed data together — via Bayes' theorem — to estimate credible effect sizes, group differences, or predictors.Propensity score matching (PSM) is a method for reducing confounding bias in observational studies by balancing baseline characteristics between treatment groups, simulating randomization. Developed by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983), it estimates the probability of receiving treatment given observed covariates, then matches or weights treated and control individuals with similar treatment probabilities. Widely used in medicine, epidemiology, and policy evaluation when randomized trials are infeasible or unethical, enabling estimation of treatment effects while controlling for selection bias.
ScholarGateDatová sada
  1. v1
  2. 2 Zdroje
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Zdroje
  3. PUBLISHED

Přejít na hledání Stáhnout prezentaci

ScholarGatePorovnat metody: Bayesian Ex Post Facto Design · Propensity Score Matching. Získáno 2026-06-18 z https://scholargate.app/cs/compare