Wordfish Scaling
Wordfish scaling is an unsupervised text-as-data method that estimates a single latent position for each political document — a party manifesto, a legislative speech, a press release — directly from its word frequencies, without any reference texts or hand coding. Introduced by Slapin and Proksch in 2008, it models word counts as draws from a Poisson distribution whose rate depends on a document position and word-specific parameters, recovering, for example, a left–right ordering of parties purely from how often each word appears in each text.
Llegeix el mètode complet
Inicia la sessió amb un compte gratuït per llegir aquesta secció.
Mapa de mètodes
El veïnat de mètodes relacionats — seleccioneu un node per explorar-lo.
Fonts
- Slapin, J. B., & Proksch, S.-O. (2008). A Scaling Model for Estimating Time-Series Party Positions from Texts. American Journal of Political Science, 52(3), 705–722. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2008.00338.x ↗
- Lowe, W., & Benoit, K. (2013). Validating Estimates of Latent Traits from Textual Data Using Human Judgment as a Benchmark. Political Analysis, 21(3), 298–313. DOI: 10.1093/pan/mpt002 ↗
- Grimmer, J., & Stewart, B. M. (2013). Text as Data: The Promise and Pitfalls of Automatic Content Analysis Methods for Political Texts. Political Analysis, 21(3), 267–297. DOI: 10.1093/pan/mps028 ↗
Com citar aquesta pàgina
ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Wordfish Scaling of Political Texts (Unsupervised Position Estimation). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/ca/political-science/wordfish-scaling
Quin mètode?
Poseu aquest mètode al costat dels seus parents més pròxims i llegiu-los de costat a costat — la biblioteca disposa els llibres sobre la taula; la tria és vostra.
- Ideal Point EstimationPolitical Science↔ compara
- Manifesto CodingPolitical Science↔ compara
- WordfishPsicometria↔ compara
- WordscoresPsicometria↔ compara
Citat per
Mètodes similars
Has vist cap problema en aquesta pàgina? Informa'n o suggereix una correcció →