ScholarGate
Assistent

Compara mètodes

Revisa els mètodes seleccionats l'un al costat de l'altre; les files que difereixen es ressalten.

Parellament Espacial de Puntuacions de Propensió×Emparellament per puntuació de propensió×
CampInferència causalEstadística per a la recerca
FamíliaRegression modelProcess / pipeline
Any d'origen2000s1983
Autor originalExtension of Rosenbaum & Rubin (1983) PSM to spatial settings; spatial adaptation developed in applied econometrics and epidemiology literature from the 2000s onwardPaul Rosenbaum and Donald Rubin
TipusQuasi-experimental matching estimatorMethod
Font seminalRosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41-55. DOI ↗Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55. DOI ↗
ÀliesSpatial PSM, Geospatial PSM, Spatially-adjusted propensity score matching, Geographic propensity score matchingPSM, propensity score weighting, covariate balance
Relacionats63
ResumSpatial Propensity Score Matching (Spatial PSM) extends the classic propensity score matching framework to settings where units are embedded in geographic space and treatment assignment or outcomes may be spatially correlated. By incorporating spatial covariates and adjacency structure into the propensity model and matching procedure, it produces causal estimates that account for geographic confounding and spillover effects.Propensity score matching (PSM) is a method for reducing confounding bias in observational studies by balancing baseline characteristics between treatment groups, simulating randomization. Developed by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983), it estimates the probability of receiving treatment given observed covariates, then matches or weights treated and control individuals with similar treatment probabilities. Widely used in medicine, epidemiology, and policy evaluation when randomized trials are infeasible or unethical, enabling estimation of treatment effects while controlling for selection bias.
ScholarGateConjunt de dades
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fonts
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Fonts
  3. PUBLISHED

Ves a la cerca Baixa les diapositives

ScholarGateCompara mètodes: Spatial Propensity Score Matching · Propensity Score Matching. Recuperat el 2026-06-18 de https://scholargate.app/ca/compare