ScholarGate
Assistent

Compara mètodes

Revisa els mètodes seleccionats l'un al costat de l'altre; les files que difereixen es ressalten.

Avaluació de Programes×Investigació basada en el disseny×
CampMètodes de campMètodes de camp
FamíliaProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Any d'origen1960s–1970s (Scriven 1967; Stufflebeam CIPP model 1971)1992
Autor originalMichael Scriven; Daniel Stufflebeam; Peter RossiAnn L. Brown and Allan Collins (independently, 1992)
TipusApplied evaluation methodologyInterventionist qualitative-quantitative mixed methodology
Font seminalRossi, P. H., Lipsey, M. W., & Freeman, H. E. (2004). Evaluation: A Systematic Approach (7th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-0761908944Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(2), 141–178. DOI ↗
Àliesevaluation research, program assessment, educational evaluation, systematic program evaluationDBR, design research, design experiment, educational design research
Relacionats36
ResumProgram evaluation is a systematic, empirically grounded process of collecting and analyzing information about a program to determine its merit, worth, or significance. Applied across education, public health, social services, and policy, it addresses questions such as whether a program is reaching its target population, whether it is being implemented as designed, and whether it is producing the intended outcomes. It draws on both quantitative and qualitative methods and serves accountability, improvement, or knowledge-generation purposes.Design-based research (DBR) is an iterative, interventionist methodology that simultaneously designs educational interventions and builds theory about how and why those interventions work in authentic, complex settings. Originating in Ann Brown's 1992 classroom experiments and Allan Collins's parallel work, DBR treats the learning environment as both the object of study and the site of theory generation, cycling through design, enactment, analysis, and redesign until both practical improvement and theoretical insight are achieved.
ScholarGateConjunt de dades
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fonts
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fonts
  3. PUBLISHED

Ves a la cerca Download slides

ScholarGateCompara mètodes: Program Evaluation · Design-based Research. Recuperat el 2026-06-15 de https://scholargate.app/ca/compare