Compara mètodes
Revisa els mètodes seleccionats l'un al costat de l'altre; les files que difereixen es ressalten.
| Emparellament per Puntuació de Propensió amb Dades de Panell× | Emparellament per puntuació de propensió× | |
|---|---|---|
| Camp≠ | Inferència causal | Estadística per a la recerca |
| Família≠ | Regression model | Process / pipeline |
| Any d'origen≠ | 1997-1998 | 1983 |
| Autor original≠ | Heckman, Ichimura & Todd | Paul Rosenbaum and Donald Rubin |
| Tipus≠ | Matching / causal inference | Method |
| Font seminal≠ | Heckman, J. J., Ichimura, H., & Todd, P. (1998). Matching as an Econometric Evaluation Estimator. Review of Economic Studies, 65(2), 261-294. DOI ↗ | Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55. DOI ↗ |
| Àlies≠ | PSM with panel data, longitudinal PSM, panel PSM, difference-in-differences PSM | PSM, propensity score weighting, covariate balance |
| Relacionats≠ | 6 | 3 |
| Resum≠ | Panel data propensity score matching combines the bias-reduction of PSM with the longitudinal structure of panel data, enabling causal estimation of treatment effects by matching treated and control units on observable pre-treatment characteristics and then differencing within matched pairs over time. Developed in the framework of Heckman, Ichimura, and Todd (1998), it is especially valuable when randomisation is infeasible and both selection on observables and time-varying confounding must be addressed simultaneously. | Propensity score matching (PSM) is a method for reducing confounding bias in observational studies by balancing baseline characteristics between treatment groups, simulating randomization. Developed by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983), it estimates the probability of receiving treatment given observed covariates, then matches or weights treated and control individuals with similar treatment probabilities. Widely used in medicine, epidemiology, and policy evaluation when randomized trials are infeasible or unethical, enabling estimation of treatment effects while controlling for selection bias. |
| ScholarGateConjunt de dades ↗ |
|
|