ScholarGate
Assistent

Compara mètodes

Revisa els mètodes seleccionats l'un al costat de l'altre; les files que difereixen es ressalten.

Avaluació de impacto contrafactual augmentada amb aprenentatge automàtic×Emparellament per puntuació de propensió×
CampInferència causalEstadística per a la recerca
FamíliaRegression modelProcess / pipeline
Any d'origen2016-20191983
Autor originalChernozhukov et al.; Athey & ImbensPaul Rosenbaum and Donald Rubin
TipusCausal inference / ML-augmented evaluationMethod
Font seminalChernozhukov, V., Chetverikov, D., Demirer, M., Duflo, E., Hansen, C., Newey, W., & Robins, J. (2018). Double/debiased machine learning for treatment and structural parameters. The Econometrics Journal, 21(1), C1-C68. DOI ↗Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55. DOI ↗
ÀliesML-augmented counterfactual evaluation, ML-CIE, causal ML impact evaluation, double ML counterfactual evaluationPSM, propensity score weighting, covariate balance
Relacionats53
ResumMachine learning-augmented counterfactual impact evaluation combines the credibility of potential-outcomes causal inference with the flexibility of modern ML algorithms. Rather than imposing parametric functional forms for confounders, ML learners — such as lasso, random forests, or neural nets — estimate nuisance functions (propensity scores, outcome regressions) that are then used to construct approximately unbiased estimates of causal effects. The canonical instantiation is Double/Debiased Machine Learning (DML), formalized by Chernozhukov et al. (2018).Propensity score matching (PSM) is a method for reducing confounding bias in observational studies by balancing baseline characteristics between treatment groups, simulating randomization. Developed by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983), it estimates the probability of receiving treatment given observed covariates, then matches or weights treated and control individuals with similar treatment probabilities. Widely used in medicine, epidemiology, and policy evaluation when randomized trials are infeasible or unethical, enabling estimation of treatment effects while controlling for selection bias.
ScholarGateConjunt de dades
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fonts
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Fonts
  3. PUBLISHED

Ves a la cerca Baixa les diapositives

ScholarGateCompara mètodes: Machine Learning-Augmented Counterfactual Impact Evaluation · Propensity Score Matching. Recuperat el 2026-06-18 de https://scholargate.app/ca/compare