Compara mètodes

	Escala de Clima d'Implementació (ICS)	Disponibilitat Organitzacional Percebuda per Assistir el Sistema (PORAS)
Camp	Ciència de la implementació	Ciència de la implementació
Família	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Any d'origen	2014	2009
Autor original	Michelle G. Ehrhart, PhD; Gregory A. Aarons, PhD; Lydia R. Farahnak, PhD	Christopher D. Helfrich, PhD; Ying-Fang Li, PhD; Neil D. Sharp, MD; colleagues at Veterans Affairs and University of Washington
Tipus	Self-report organizational survey	Self-report organizational survey
Font seminal	Ehrhart, M. G., Aarons, G. A., & Farahnak, L. R. (2014). Assessing the organizational context for EBP implementation: The Development and Validity Testing of the Implementation Climate Scale (ICS). Implementation Science, 9, 157.	Helfrich, C. D., Li, Y. F., Sharp, N. D., & Sales, A. E. (2009). Organizational readiness to change assessment (ORCA): Development of an instrument based on the perspectives of health care professionals. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 16(4), 523–530.
Àlies	ICS, Implementation Climate, Implementation Climate Scale-4	PORAS, Perceived Organizational Readiness, Perceived Readiness Scale
Relacionats	5	5
Resum	The Implementation Climate Scale (ICS) is a brief organizational assessment tool that measures the extent to which an organization's work climate, policies, and systems are aligned with and supportive of evidence-based practice (EBP) implementation. Developed by Ehrhart, Aarons, and Farahnak in 2014, the ICS measures four dimensions of organizational implementation climate: Focus (degree to which EBP is a priority in organizational goals), Support (availability of resources and protected time for EBP), Reward (incentive structures and recognition for EBP use), and Expectations (leadership communication of expectations for EBP adoption and fidelity). The ICS provides a concise snapshot of whether organizational systems and policies actively facilitate or hinder EBP uptake, and has demonstrated strong predictive validity for implementation fidelity and sustainability.	The Perceived Organizational Readiness for Assisting the System (PORAS) is a 19-item self-report measure developed by Helfrich and colleagues to assess organizational readiness to implement health information technology systems and other healthcare innovations. Grounded in Weiner's theory of organizational readiness for change, the PORAS measures four dimensions of readiness: Valence (perceived importance of the change to the organization), Motivation (organizational commitment and drive to implement), Resource Adequacy (availability of financial, human, and technical resources), and Change Efficacy (staff belief in organizational capability to successfully implement). While originally developed for health IT implementation, the PORAS framework and scale are applicable to broader healthcare innovations and evidence-based practice implementation.