Compara mètodes
Revisa els mètodes seleccionats l'un al costat de l'altre; les files que difereixen es ressalten.
| Detecció de Comunitats× | Model de Gràfic Aleatori Exponencial (ERGM / p*)× | Models de difusió en xarxa× | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Camp | Anàlisi de xarxes | Anàlisi de xarxes | Anàlisi de xarxes |
| Família | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Any d'origen≠ | 2002–2019 (algorithm family) | 1986 (foundational); modern ERGM framework 1996–2007 | 1927 (epidemiological compartmental); 2003 (social influence cascade) |
| Autor original≠ | Louvain: Blondel et al. (2008); Leiden: Traag et al. (2019); Girvan-Newman: Girvan & Newman (2002); Infomap: Rosvall & Bergstrom (2008) | Frank & Strauss (1986); extended by Wasserman & Pattison (1996) and Robins et al. (2007) | Kermack & McKendrick (SIR/SIS, 1927); Kempe, Kleinberg & Tardos (Independent Cascade, 2003) |
| Tipus≠ | Graph-partitioning / clustering algorithm family | Probabilistic generative network model | Stochastic / deterministic simulation on graphs |
| Font seminal≠ | Blondel, V.D., Guillaume, J.-L., Lambiotte, R. & Lefebvre, E. (2008). Fast Unfolding of Communities in Large Networks. Journal of Statistical Mechanics, 2008(10), P10008. DOI ↗ | Robins, G., Pattison, P., Kalish, Y., & Lusher, D. (2007). An introduction to exponential random graph (p*) models for social networks. Social Networks, 29(2), 173-191. DOI ↗ | Kermack, W.O. & McKendrick, A.G. (1927). A Contribution to the Mathematical Theory of Epidemics. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, 115(772), 700-721. DOI ↗ |
| Àlies≠ | graph clustering, network partitioning, Topluluk Tespiti (Louvain, Girvan-Newman, Leiden) | ERGM, p-star model, p* model, Üstel Rastgele Graf Modeli (ERGM / p*) | epidemic spreading models, compartmental models, influence propagation models, Ağ Yayılım Modelleri (SIR, SIS, Independent Cascade) |
| Relacionats≠ | 5 | 6 | 5 |
| Resum≠ | Community detection is a family of graph-partitioning algorithms that discover densely connected sub-groups — communities — within a network. First formalised through the modularity measure by Girvan and Newman (2002), the field advanced rapidly with the Louvain method (Blondel et al., 2008), the Leiden refinement (Traag et al., 2019), and the information-theoretic Infomap approach. All variants answer the same question: which nodes cluster together more tightly among themselves than with the rest of the network? | The Exponential Random Graph Model (ERGM), also known as the p* model, is a statistical framework for network analysis that models the probability of an observed network as a function of its local structural features — such as reciprocity, triangles, and degree distribution. Developed from the foundational work of Frank and Strauss (1986) and extended into the modern framework by Wasserman and Pattison (1996) and Robins et al. (2007), ERGM is the inferential standard for social network analysis, capable of testing whether observed network structures arise by chance or reflect genuine social processes. | Network diffusion models are a family of compartmental and probabilistic frameworks that simulate how information, disease, or innovation spreads across a connected system. Rooted in the mathematical epidemiology of Kermack and McKendrick (1927), the SIR and SIS models partition nodes into states and track transitions driven by contact rates and recovery probabilities. The Independent Cascade and Linear Threshold models, formalised by Kempe, Kleinberg, and Tardos (2003), extend this logic to social influence, modelling how activation propagates through a network one neighbour at a time. |
| ScholarGateConjunt de dades ↗ |
|
|
|