Сравнение на методи
Прегледайте избраните методи един до друг; редовете с разлики са откроени.
| Оценчик за съвпадение при оценка на политики× | Претегляне с обратна вероятност на лечението (IPW / IPTW)× | |
|---|---|---|
| Област | Причинно-следствено заключение | Причинно-следствено заключение |
| Семейство | Regression model | Regression model |
| Година на възникване≠ | 1998-2006 | 2000 |
| Създател≠ | Heckman, Ichimura & Todd; Abadie & Imbens | Robins, Hernán & Brumback |
| Тип≠ | Non-parametric causal estimator | Causal inference weighting estimator |
| Основополагащ източник≠ | Abadie, A., & Imbens, G. W. (2006). Large sample properties of matching estimators for average treatment effects. Econometrica, 74(1), 235-267. DOI ↗ | Robins, J. M., Hernán, M. A., & Brumback, B. (2000). Marginal Structural Models and Causal Inference in Epidemiology. Epidemiology, 11(5), 550-560. DOI ↗ |
| Други названия≠ | matching estimator, program evaluation matching, treatment effect matching, Abadie-Imbens estimator | IPW, IPTW, inverse probability of treatment weighting, marginal structural model weighting |
| Свързани≠ | 6 | 5 |
| Резюме≠ | The policy evaluation matching estimator estimates the causal effect of a program or policy on treated units by pairing each participant with one or more non-participants who share similar pre-treatment characteristics. Developed rigorously by Heckman, Ichimura & Todd (1998) and Abadie & Imbens (2006), it avoids parametric outcome models and is the standard non-parametric tool for program and policy evaluation. | Inverse Probability Weighting is a causal-inference method that assigns each observation a weight equal to the inverse of its probability of receiving the treatment it actually received. Introduced by Robins, Hernán and Brumback (2000) for marginal structural models, it builds a pseudo-population in which treatment is independent of measured confounders, balancing selection bias. |
| ScholarGateНабор от данни ↗ |
|
|