Сравнение на методи
Прегледайте избраните методи един до друг; редовете с разлики са откроени.
| Критично образователно действие-изследване× | Образователни изследвания чрез действие× | |
|---|---|---|
| Област | Полеви методи | Полеви методи |
| Семейство | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Година на възникване≠ | 1986 | 1940s (Lewin); educational context developed 1970s–1980s |
| Създател≠ | Wilfred Carr & Stephen Kemmis | Kurt Lewin (action research foundations); Lawrence Stenhouse and John Elliott (educational adaptation) |
| Тип≠ | Qualitative participatory research design | Participatory qualitative research design |
| Основополагащ източник≠ | Carr, W., & Kemmis, S. (1986). Becoming Critical: Education, Knowledge and Action Research. Falmer Press. ISBN: 978-1850000235 | Elliott, J. (1991). Action Research for Educational Change. Open University Press. ISBN: 978-0335096190 |
| Други названия | critical-emancipatory action research, CEAR, critical participatory action research in education, emancipatory educational inquiry | EAR, practitioner research, teacher action research, classroom action research |
| Свързани≠ | 4 | 6 |
| Резюме≠ | Critical educational action research is a cyclical, participatory research design in which educators collaboratively examine and transform their own practice through iterative cycles of planning, action, observation, and critical reflection. Grounded in critical theory, it goes beyond improving techniques to questioning the social, institutional, and ideological conditions that shape educational practice, aiming at emancipation from unjust or oppressive structures. | Educational action research is a cyclical, practitioner-led inquiry method in which educators systematically investigate a problem or opportunity in their own classroom or school, implement a change, observe its effects, and reflect on findings to guide the next cycle. Rooted in Kurt Lewin's action research framework and developed for educational contexts by Lawrence Stenhouse and John Elliott, it bridges the gap between educational theory and classroom practice by making teachers agents of rigorous inquiry. |
| ScholarGateНабор от данни ↗ |
|
|