Democratic Norms Support Measurement
This approach measures how committed ordinary citizens are to democratic norms by observing the price they are willing to pay to uphold them. Rather than asking abstractly whether people value democracy, Matthew Graham and Milan Svolik's 2020 candidate-choice design confronts voters with a co-partisan candidate who violates a democratic principle and estimates how much electoral support that violation costs. Their finding that most Americans will tolerate undemocratic behavior by their own side when partisanship and policy stakes are high reframed the study of democratic backsliding around revealed, not professed, commitment. Christopher Claassen's parallel work links aggregate diffuse support for democracy to whether democracies survive.
اقرأ الطريقة كاملة
سجّل الدخول بحساب مجاني لقراءة هذا القسم.
خريطة المناهج
محيط المناهج ذات الصلة — اختر عقدةً للاستكشاف.
المصادر
- Graham, M. H., & Svolik, M. W. (2020). Democracy in America? Partisanship, Polarization, and the Robustness of Support for Democracy in the United States. American Political Science Review, 114(2), 392-409. DOI: 10.1017/S0003055420000052 ↗
- Claassen, C. (2020). Does Public Support Help Democracy Survive? American Journal of Political Science, 64(1), 118-134. DOI: 10.1111/ajps.12452 ↗
كيف تستشهد بهذه الصفحة
ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Measuring Mass Support for Democratic Norms (Candidate-Choice Tradeoff Design). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/ar/political-psychology/democratic-norms-support-scale
أيُّ منهج؟
ضع هذا المنهج إلى جانب أقرب نظائره واقرأهما جنباً إلى جنب — المكتبة تضع الكتب على الطاولة، والاختيار لك.
- Elite Cue Experimentعلم النفس السياسي↔ قارن
- مقياس الثقة السياسيةعلم النفس السياسي↔ قارن
- Support for Political Violence Measureعلم النفس السياسي↔ قارن