ScholarGate
المساعد

قارن الطرق

راجع الطرق التي اخترتها جنبًا إلى جنب؛ الصفوف المختلفة مميَّزة.

مطابقة درجات الميل القوية×الترجيح بالدرجة الميولية (PSW / IPW)×
المجالالاستدلال السببيالاستدلال السببي
العائلةRegression modelRegression model
سنة النشأة2016 (robust variance correction); 1983 (PSM foundations)1983 (propensity score); 2003 (efficient IPW estimator)
صاحب الطريقةAbadie & Imbens (2016) for matching-on-estimated-propensity-score with corrected variance; Rosenbaum & Rubin (1983) for PSM foundationsRosenbaum & Rubin (propensity score); Hirano, Imbens & Ridder (efficient weighting)
النوعQuasi-experimental matching estimator with robust inferenceCausal inference / reweighting
المصدر التأسيسيAbadie, A., & Imbens, G. W. (2016). Matching on the Estimated Propensity Score. Econometrica, 84(2), 781-807. DOI ↗Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41-55. DOI ↗
الأسماء البديلةrobust PSM, PSM with robust variance, bias-corrected PSM, matching with robust inferencePSW, inverse probability weighting, IPW, propensity-based weighting
ذات صلة66
الملخصRobust Propensity Score Matching (robust PSM) is a quasi-experimental causal inference method that pairs treated and control units on their estimated probability of receiving treatment (the propensity score), then estimates the average treatment effect using variance estimators that account for the uncertainty introduced by estimating the propensity score itself. The correction, developed by Abadie and Imbens (2016), prevents misleading inference that standard bootstrap or analytic formulas produce when applied naively after matching.Propensity score weighting is a causal-inference method that reweights observations so that the covariate distributions of treated and untreated units look exchangeable, enabling unbiased estimation of average treatment effects from observational data. Each unit receives a weight that is the inverse of its probability of receiving the treatment it actually received — a strategy formalised by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983) and given its efficient semiparametric form by Hirano, Imbens and Ridder (2003).
ScholarGateمجموعة البيانات
  1. v1
  2. 2 المصادر
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 المصادر
  3. PUBLISHED

انتقل إلى البحث تنزيل الشرائح

ScholarGateقارن الطرق: Robust Propensity Score Matching · Propensity Score Weighting. استُرجع بتاريخ 2026-06-18 من https://scholargate.app/ar/compare