قارن الطرق
راجع الطرق التي اخترتها جنبًا إلى جنب؛ الصفوف المختلفة مميَّزة.
| تحليل حجم التأثير القوي× | تحليل حجم التأثير× | |
|---|---|---|
| المجال | الإحصاء | الإحصاء |
| العائلة | Hypothesis test | Hypothesis test |
| سنة النشأة≠ | 2005 (formalized) | 1969 (first edition); 1988 (definitive second edition) |
| صاحب الطريقة≠ | Algina, Keselman & Penfield; Wilcox | Jacob Cohen |
| النوع≠ | Robust effect size estimation | Standardized magnitude estimation |
| المصدر التأسيسي≠ | Algina, J., Keselman, H. J., & Penfield, R. D. (2005). An alternative to Cohen's standardized mean difference effect size: A robust parameter and confidence interval in the two independent groups case. Psychological Methods, 10(3), 317–328. DOI ↗ | Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. ISBN: 978-0805802832 |
| الأسماء البديلة | robust Cohen's d, trimmed-mean effect size, outlier-resistant effect size, robust standardized mean difference | effect magnitude estimation, standardized effect measure, practical significance analysis, ES analysis |
| ذات صلة≠ | 5 | 4 |
| الملخص≠ | Robust effect size analysis quantifies the magnitude of a difference or association using estimators that are resistant to outliers and violations of normality. Rather than relying on classical statistics such as Cohen's d based on sample means and standard deviations, robust variants use trimmed means and Winsorized standard deviations to produce effect size estimates that accurately reflect the typical effect rather than being inflated by extreme values. | Effect size analysis quantifies the practical magnitude of a statistical result independently of sample size. Rather than asking only whether a difference or relationship is statistically significant, it asks how large it is, using standardized indices such as Cohen's d, eta-squared, omega-squared, or Pearson's r that allow direct comparison across studies and populations. |
| ScholarGateمجموعة البيانات ↗ |
|
|