ScholarGate
المساعد

قارن الطرق

راجع الطرق التي اخترتها جنبًا إلى جنب؛ الصفوف المختلفة مميَّزة.

مقياس الكفاءة السريرية للتمريض (NCCS)×مقياس جودة التدريس السريري (CTQS)×
المجالالتثقيف الصحيالتثقيف الصحي
العائلةProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
سنة النشأة20092001–2003
صاحب الطريقةRozahn Walt & Charmaine van der WaltKristina Ohrling & Ingela R. Hallberg
النوعSelf-report and clinician-rated scaleSelf-report questionnaire
المصدر التأسيسيWalt, R. & van der Walt, C. (2009). The nursing clinical competence scale: Development and psychometric testing of a self-assessment instrument. Nurse Educ Today 29(6): 610–616. link ↗Ohrling, K. & Hallberg, I. R. (2001). The meaning of precepting: Nurse preceptors' lived experience of precept education. J Adv Nurs 33(1): 96–103. link ↗
الأسماء البديلةClinical Competence Scale, Nursing Skills Assessment, Competency Rating ScaleTeaching Quality Assessment, Clinical Instructor Effectiveness Scale
ذات صلة44
الملخصThe NCCS is a multidimensional self-assessment and clinician-rated instrument measuring nursing students' perceived and observed clinical competence across technical, interpersonal, and cognitive domains. Developed by Walt and van der Walt in 2009, the scale evaluates students' mastery of fundamental nursing skills, critical thinking, communication, and professional judgment. It is used in nursing education to monitor competence development, identify learning gaps, and predict readiness for licensure examinations (e.g., NCLEX-RN).The CTQS is a self-report questionnaire measuring students' perceptions of their clinical educator's (preceptor, clinical instructor, or mentor) teaching quality and effectiveness. Developed by Ohrling, Hallberg, and Gaberson in the early 2000s, the CTQS evaluates dimensions of clinical teaching including role modeling, knowledge transmission, feedback quality, student empowerment, and development of critical thinking. The scale is used in nursing and health professions education to provide educators with feedback on their teaching performance, identify professional development needs, and inform program quality assurance.
ScholarGateمجموعة البيانات
  1. v1
  2. 2 المصادر
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 المصادر
  3. PUBLISHED

انتقل إلى البحث تنزيل الشرائح

ScholarGateقارن الطرق: NCCS · CTQS. استُرجع بتاريخ 2026-06-19 من https://scholargate.app/ar/compare