قارن الطرق
راجع الطرق التي اخترتها جنبًا إلى جنب؛ الصفوف المختلفة مميَّزة.
| الدقة المتوازنة× | الدقة× | مقياس F1 (F1-Score)× | الاستدعاء (الحساسية)× | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| المجال | تقييم النماذج | تقييم النماذج | تقييم النماذج | تقييم النماذج |
| العائلة | MCDM | MCDM | MCDM | MCDM |
| سنة النشأة≠ | 2010 | 20th century | 1979 | 20th century |
| صاحب الطريقة≠ | Brodersen, Ong, Stephan, and Buhmann | Historical statistical foundations | C. J. van Rijsbergen | Historical statistical foundations |
| النوع | Evaluation metric | Evaluation metric | Evaluation metric | Evaluation metric |
| المصدر التأسيسي≠ | Brodersen, K. H., Ong, C. S., Stephan, K. E., & Buhmann, J. M. (2010). The balanced accuracy and its posterior distribution. 20th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR), 3121-3124. DOI ↗ | Fawcett, T. (2006). An introduction to ROC analysis. Pattern Recognition Letters, 27(8), 861-874. DOI ↗ | van Rijsbergen, C. J. (1979). Information Retrieval (2nd ed.). Butterworth-Heinemann. link ↗ | Fawcett, T. (2006). An introduction to ROC analysis. Pattern Recognition Letters, 27(8), 861-874. DOI ↗ |
| الأسماء البديلة≠ | Average Recall, Equal-weight Average Sensitivity | Overall Accuracy, Correct Classification Rate | F-measure, Harmonic Mean | Sensitivity, True Positive Rate, TPR |
| ذات صلة | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| الملخص≠ | Balanced accuracy is the average of recall values computed for each class separately. It corrects for class imbalance by giving equal weight to the performance on each class, regardless of class frequency in the dataset. | Accuracy is the proportion of correct predictions among the total number of predictions made by a classification model. It is the most intuitive performance metric and measures how often the classifier makes correct predictions overall, regardless of class. | The F1-score is the harmonic mean of precision and recall, providing a single metric that balances both concerns. It was introduced by van Rijsbergen in information retrieval and has become a standard metric for evaluating classification models where both precision and recall are important. | Recall measures the proportion of actual positive cases that were correctly identified by the classifier. It answers the question: 'Of all the cases that were truly positive, how many did we find?' Recall is critical in scenarios where missing positive cases is costly. |
| ScholarGateمجموعة البيانات ↗ |
|
|
|
|