Sibling Fixed-Effects Design
The sibling fixed-effects, or sibling-comparison, design controls for everything that siblings share by construction. Genes (on average half), parents, household income, neighborhood, schooling, and family culture are differenced out when you compare brothers or sisters who differ in an exposure, so the residual within-family association is purged of all confounders common to the family. D'Onofrio, Lahey, Turkheimer, and Lichtenstein championed these family-based quasi-experiments as a way to integrate genetic and social-science research by rigorously testing competing causal hypotheses. Frisell and colleagues, however, gave the design its essential warning label: precisely because shared confounding is removed, the within-family estimate is unusually vulnerable to the confounders siblings do not share and to attenuation from measurement error. The design is powerful but double-edged.
阅读完整方法
使用免费账户登录即可阅读本节。
方法图谱
相关方法的邻域——选择一个节点以展开探索。
来源
- Frisell, T., Oberg, S., Kuja-Halkola, R., & Sjolander, A. (2012). Sibling Comparison Designs: Bias From Non-Shared Confounders and Measurement Error. Epidemiology, 23(5), 713-720. DOI: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e31825fa230 ↗
- D'Onofrio, B. M., Lahey, B. B., Turkheimer, E., & Lichtenstein, P. (2013). Critical Need for Family-Based, Quasi-Experimental Designs in Integrating Genetic and Social Science Research. American Journal of Public Health, 103(S1), S46-S55. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301252 ↗
如何引用本页
ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Sibling-Comparison (Within-Family Fixed-Effects) Design for Shared Familial Confounding. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/zh/social-epidemiology/sibling-fixed-effects-design
选用哪种方法?
将本方法与其最相近的同类并置,并排研读——本馆将书籍铺陈于案上,取舍则由您定夺。
- Chains-of-Risk ModelSocial Epidemiology↔ 比较
- E-Value Sensitivity AnalysisSocial Epidemiology↔ 比较
- Life-Course EpidemiologySocial Epidemiology↔ 比较
- Negative Control Outcome DesignSocial Epidemiology↔ 比较