ScholarGate
助手
Process / pipelineLibrary & information science / cataloguing quality

Bibliographic Record Quality Analysis

Bibliographic record quality analysis evaluates the catalogue records that describe library resources — typically MARC or linked-data records built to standards such as RDA — to determine how well they serve their purpose. Philip Hider's account of information resource description frames quality in terms of accuracy, completeness, consistency, and conformance to cataloguing rules, while Elaine Svenonius's objectives of the catalogue — to find, identify, select, and obtain resources — supply the functional yardstick against which records are ultimately judged. The analysis samples records, scores them on each quality criterion, checks their encoding and content against the relevant standard, and asks whether they actually let users carry out the catalogue's core tasks. The result is evidence about where cataloguing is strong, where it fails, and what remediation or policy change is needed.

在 MethodMind 中打开即将推出应用、比较、获取指导
工具与资源
下载幻灯片
学习与探索
视频即将推出

阅读完整方法

仅限会员

使用免费账户登录即可阅读本节。

登录

方法图谱

相关方法的邻域——选择一个节点以展开探索。

来源

  1. Hider, P. (2018). Information Resource Description: Creating and Managing Metadata (2nd ed.). London: Facet Publishing. ISBN: 9781783302239
  2. Svenonius, E. (2000). The Intellectual Foundation of Information Organization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. ISBN: 9780262194334

如何引用本页

ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Bibliographic Record Quality Analysis (Evaluating Catalogue Records Against Functional Objectives). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/zh/library-information-science/bibliographic-record-quality-analysis

选用哪种方法?

将本方法与其最相近的同类并置,并排研读——本馆将书籍铺陈于案上,取舍则由您定夺。

并排比较

被引用于

ScholarGateBibliographic Record Quality Analysis (Bibliographic Record Quality Analysis (Evaluating Catalogue Records Against Functional Objectives)). 于 2026-06-24 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/library-information-science/bibliographic-record-quality-analysis · 数据集: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026