Process / pipelineimplementation measurement
实施中的忠实度评估
忠实度评估(Fidelity Assessment)是对干预措施在实际操作中按设计方案实施程度的系统性衡量。由美国国立卫生研究院行为改变联盟(National Institutes of Health Behavior Change Consortium)正式提出(Bellg et al. 2004),并由医学研究理事会(MRC)指南(Moore et al. 2015)进一步扩展,忠实度评估对实施科学至关重要,因为它回答了以下问题:“我们是否正确地实施了干预措施?”一项临床试验可能表明某种治疗有效,但如果在实践中实施不力,其益处就会消失。忠实度评估可以防止失败的错误归因(是干预措施本身薄弱,还是实施不力?)并指导改进质量的辅导。
阅读完整方法
仅限会员
登录使用免费账户登录即可阅读本节。
方法图谱
相关方法的邻域——选择一个节点以展开探索。
来源
- Bellg, A. J., Borrelli, B., Resnick, B., Hecht, J., Minicucci, D. S., Ory, M., ... & Treatment Fidelity Workgroup of the National Institutes of Health Behavior Change Consortium. (2004). Enhancing treatment fidelity in health behavior change studies: Best practices and recommendations from the NIH Behavior Change Consortium. Health Psychology, 23(5), 443-451. DOI: 10.1037/0278-6133.23.5.443 ↗
- Moore, G. F., Audrey, S., Barker, M., Bond, L., Bonell, C., Hardeman, W., ... & Baird, J. (2015). Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ, 350, h1258. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.h1258 ↗
- Schoenwald, S. K., & Garland, A. F. (2013). A review of treatment adherence measurement methods. Psychological Assessment, 25(1), 146-156. DOI: 10.1037/a0029715 ↗
如何引用本页
ScholarGate. (2026, June 4). Fidelity Assessment: Measuring the Degree to Which Interventions Are Delivered as Intended in Real-World Implementation. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/zh/implementation-science/fidelity-assessment
选用哪种方法?
将本方法与其最相近的同类并置,并排研读——本馆将书籍铺陈于案上,取舍则由您定夺。
- 实施研究综合框架 (CFIR)实施科学↔ 比较
- 实施结果分类实施科学↔ 比较
- 规范化过程理论 (NPT)实施科学↔ 比较
- RE-AIM框架实施科学↔ 比较
- Scaling Up Health Interventions实施科学↔ 比较