ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

Z数扩展的EDAS方法×准则重要性通过准则间相关性 (CRITIC)×
领域决策决策
方法族MCDMMCDM
起源年份20111995
提出者Zadeh, L. A.Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L.
类型Z-Number outranking/ranking — Z-Number (Z = (A, B): restriction A, reliability B; both fuzzy)Statistical contrast intensity + correlation-based objective weighting
开创性文献Zadeh, L. A. (2011). A note on Z-numbers. Information Sciences DOI ↗Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. (1995). Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The CRITIC method. Computers & Operations Research DOI ↗
别名
相关88
摘要Z-EDAS (Z-Number extension of EDAS) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zadeh, L. A. in 2011. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.CRITIC (CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. in 1995. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Z-EDAS · CRITIC. 于 2026-06-17 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare