ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

Z数最优最差法×Z数扩展的TOPSIS方法×
领域决策决策
方法族MCDMMCDM
起源年份20182018
提出者Aboutorab, Saberi, Asadabadi, Hussain, Chang (UTS Sydney, Australia)Gardashova, L. A.
类型Pairwise comparison weighting under Z-number uncertaintyZ-Number outranking/ranking — Z-Number (Z = (A, B): restriction A, reliability B; both fuzzy)
开创性文献Aboutorab, H., Saberi, M., Asadabadi, M.R., Hussain, O., Chang, E. (2018). ZBWM: The Z-number extension of Best Worst Method and its application for supplier development. Expert Systems with Applications DOI ↗Gardashova, L. A. (2018). Z-Number Based TOPSIS Method in Multi-Criteria Decision Making. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing DOI ↗
别名
相关88
摘要Z-BWM (Z-Number Best-Worst Method) is a weighting multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Aboutorab, Saberi, Asadabadi, Hussain, Chang (UTS Sydney, Australia) in 2018. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.Z-TOPSIS (Z-Number extension of TOPSIS) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Gardashova, L. A. in 2018. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Z-BWM · Z-TOPSIS. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare