方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 加权社会网络分析× | 模块度分析× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 网络分析 | 网络分析 |
| 方法族 | Machine learning | Machine learning |
| 起源年份≠ | 2004–2010 | 2004 |
| 提出者≠ | Barrat, A.; Opsahl, T. et al. | Newman, M. E. J. & Girvan, M. |
| 类型≠ | Network analysis framework | Community detection / graph partitioning |
| 开创性文献≠ | Barrat, A., Barthélemy, M., Pastor-Satorras, R., & Vespignani, A. (2004). The architecture of complex weighted networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 101(11), 3747–3752. DOI ↗ | Newman, M. E. J., & Girvan, M. (2004). Finding and evaluating community structure in networks. Physical Review E, 69(2), 026113. DOI ↗ |
| 别名 | Weighted SNA, valued network analysis, tie-strength network analysis, weighted graph analysis | Q-modularity, community structure detection, network modularity optimization, graph partitioning by modularity |
| 相关≠ | 6 | 5 |
| 摘要≠ | Weighted Social Network Analysis extends classical SNA by assigning numeric values — weights — to ties between actors, capturing tie strength, interaction frequency, or resource flow. Rather than treating all connections as equal, it reveals who holds privileged positions by virtue of the intensity, not merely the existence, of their relationships. | Modularity analysis is a network science method, formalized by Newman and Girvan in 2004, that detects community structure in graphs by measuring whether edges are more concentrated within groups than expected by chance. Its scalar quality index Q guides algorithms that partition nodes into cohesive clusters, making it the most widely adopted framework for community detection in social, biological, and technological networks. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|