ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

加权滚雪球抽样×目的性抽样×
领域调查方法论调查方法论
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份1997Formalized ~1980–1990
提出者Douglas D. Heckathorn (formal probability-weighted variant)Michael Quinn Patton (systematic articulation); roots in early qualitative inquiry
类型Probability-adjusted chain-referral samplingNon-probability sampling strategy
开创性文献Heckathorn, D. D. (1997). Respondent-driven sampling: A new approach to the study of hidden populations. Social Problems, 44(2), 174–199. DOI ↗Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods (2nd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-0803937796
别名weight-adjusted chain-referral sampling, probability-weighted snowball sampling, WSS, weighted referral samplingjudgmental sampling, selective sampling, criterion-based sampling, purposeful sampling
相关54
摘要Weighted snowball sampling is a chain-referral technique in which participants recruit peers from a hidden or hard-to-reach population, and differential inclusion probabilities are estimated and corrected through statistical weights. Unlike basic snowball sampling, the weighting step allows approximately unbiased population estimates, bridging the gap between convenience-driven recruitment and probability-based inference.Purposive sampling is a non-probability strategy in which the researcher deliberately selects participants, documents, or cases that are information-rich with respect to the research question. Rather than drawing units at random, the researcher applies explicit criteria aligned with the study's purpose, maximising the depth and relevance of the data collected. It is the default sampling logic in most qualitative research designs and is also used in mixed-methods and applied evaluative work.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Weighted Snowball Sampling · Purposive sampling. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare