ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

Web Controversy Analysis×Actor-Network Theory Analysis×
领域Science Technology StudiesScience Technology Studies
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份20121984
提出者Tommaso Venturini, Noortje MarresBruno Latour, Michel Callon, John Law
类型Web-native controversy research methodMaterial-semiotic theory and analytic method
开创性文献Venturini, T. (2012). Building on faults: how to represent controversies with digital methods. Public Understanding of Science, 21(7), 796-812. DOI ↗Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford University Press. ISBN: 9780199256051
别名Web controversy mapping, Hyperlink controversy analysis, Online controversy cartographyANT analysis, Sociology of translation, Actant-network mapping
相关44
摘要Web controversy analysis studies scientific, technical, and public controversies through the traces they leave online—hyperlink networks, search-engine results, and social-media activity. Building on the controversy-mapping tradition but reworking it as a web-native digital method, it follows Tommaso Venturini's call to 'build on faults' and Noortje Marres's argument for controversy analysis as a digital method, using crawling and co-link analysis to reveal how positions in a dispute are connected, opposed, and arranged across the web.Actor-Network Theory analysis treats society and technology as a single woven fabric, mapping how heterogeneous human and non-human actors—engineers, scallops, documents, machines, regulators—are linked into networks through a process of translation. Rather than explaining technical outcomes by appeal to pre-given social categories, ANT follows the actors themselves and describes how durable arrangements are assembled, stabilised, and sometimes undone.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Web Controversy Analysis · Actor-Network Theory Analysis. 于 2026-06-24 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare