方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| VOSviewer辅助的范围回顾× | 文献计量分析× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 科学计量学 | 科学计量学 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 2010s–present | 1969 (term coined); practice dates to 1920s–1930s |
| 提出者≠ | Combination: Arksey & O'Malley (scoping review, 2005); van Eck & Waltman (VOSviewer, 2010) | Alan Pritchard (coined term); earlier quantitative work by Paul Otlet (1934) and S. C. Bradford (1934) |
| 类型≠ | Hybrid review methodology | Quantitative literature analysis |
| 开创性文献≠ | van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. DOI ↗ | Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics? Journal of Documentation, 25(4), 348–349. link ↗ |
| 别名 | VOSviewer scoping review, bibliometric-enhanced scoping review, VOS-assisted scoping review, science-mapping scoping review | bibliometrics, bibliometric study, bibliometric mapping, publication analysis |
| 相关≠ | 5 | 6 |
| 摘要≠ | A VOSviewer-assisted scoping review integrates the structured, broad-mapping purpose of a scoping review with VOSviewer's bibliometric visualization capabilities. After standard database searching and eligibility screening, the retained records are exported to VOSviewer, which produces co-authorship, keyword co-occurrence, and citation-based cluster maps. These visual outputs guide thematic synthesis, reveal intellectual structure, and make the scope of a field immediately transparent. | Bibliometric analysis applies statistical and mathematical methods to bibliographic records — publications, citations, authors, journals, and keywords — to measure and map the structure, output, and intellectual evolution of a research field. It is widely used to identify influential works, prolific authors, productive journals, collaboration networks, and emerging research themes across any academic discipline. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|