ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

基于VOSviewer的科学制图×文献计量分析×
领域科学计量学科学计量学
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份20101969 (term coined); practice dates to 1920s–1930s
提出者Nees Jan van Eck & Ludo Waltman (Leiden University)Alan Pritchard (coined term); earlier quantitative work by Paul Otlet (1934) and S. C. Bradford (1934)
类型Bibliometric mapping techniqueQuantitative literature analysis
开创性文献van Eck, N.J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. DOI ↗Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics? Journal of Documentation, 25(4), 348–349. link ↗
别名VOSviewer science mapping, bibliometric science mapping with VOSviewer, VOS-based science mapping, VOSviewer network mappingbibliometrics, bibliometric study, bibliometric mapping, publication analysis
相关66
摘要VOSviewer-assisted science mapping uses the VOSviewer software — developed at Leiden University — to construct and visualize bibliometric networks from publication metadata. It applies the VOS (Visualization of Similarities) mapping technique to reveal intellectual structures in a research field: co-authorship networks, citation landscapes, keyword clusters, and thematic frontiers, all rendered as interactive, color-coded network maps that expose how concepts, authors, and journals are relationally positioned within a discipline.Bibliometric analysis applies statistical and mathematical methods to bibliographic records — publications, citations, authors, journals, and keywords — to measure and map the structure, output, and intellectual evolution of a research field. It is widely used to identify influential works, prolific authors, productive journals, collaboration networks, and emerging research themes across any academic discipline.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: VOSviewer-assisted science mapping · Bibliometric Analysis. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare