ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

VOSviewer辅助的共被引分析×共词分析×
领域科学计量学科学计量学
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份1973 (co-citation); VOSviewer workflow from ~20101983
提出者Henry Small (co-citation, 1973); Nees Jan van Eck & Ludo Waltman (VOSviewer, 2010)Michel Callon, Jean-Pierre Courtial, and colleagues
类型Bibliometric network analysisScientometric network analysis technique
开创性文献Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4), 265–269. DOI ↗Callon, M., Courtial, J. P., Turner, W. A., & Bauin, S. (1983). From translations to problematic networks: An introduction to co-word analysis. Social Science Information, 22(2), 191–235. DOI ↗
别名VOSviewer co-citation mapping, bibliometric co-citation visualization, co-citation network analysis with VOSviewer, CCA-VOSviewerkeyword co-occurrence analysis, co-word mapping, keyword co-word network, CWA
相关66
摘要VOSviewer-assisted co-citation analysis combines Henry Small's co-citation measure — counting how often two documents are jointly cited by later work — with VOSviewer's automated network construction and visual mapping capabilities. The result is a spatial map of the intellectual base of a research field, where documents that share many citing contexts cluster together, revealing foundational schools of thought and their relationships.Co-word analysis is a scientometric technique that quantifies how often pairs of keywords, subject terms, or title words appear together across a corpus of publications. By treating simultaneous occurrence as a proxy for conceptual relatedness, it constructs networks and clusters that reveal the intellectual structure, dominant themes, and emerging sub-fields of a research domain.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: VOSviewer-assisted co-citation analysis · Co-word Analysis. 于 2026-06-19 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare