方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 视觉诱导制度民族志× | 话语分析× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域≠ | 质性 | 质性研究 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 2000s–2010s (integration period; IE roots ~1987, photo elicitation ~1967) | 1989 (Fairclough); 1987 (Potter & Wetherell) |
| 提出者≠ | Dorothy E. Smith (IE); Douglas Harper (photo elicitation); integration developed by feminist and critical ethnographers in the 2000s–2010s | Norman Fairclough; Jonathan Potter and Margaret Wetherell |
| 类型≠ | Qualitative multimodal research design | Method |
| 开创性文献≠ | Smith, D. E. (2005). Institutional Ethnography: A Sociology for People. AltaMira Press. ISBN: 978-0759105010 | Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Longman. link ↗ |
| 别名≠ | photo elicitation IE, visual IE, image-based institutional ethnography, visual data institutional ethnography | DA, Critical Discourse Analysis, Discursive Analysis |
| 相关≠ | 5 | 2 |
| 摘要≠ | Visual elicitation institutional ethnography (IE) integrates photo or image elicitation techniques into Dorothy Smith's institutional ethnography framework. Participants produce or select photographs and other visual materials that represent their everyday experience within an institution; these images then anchor in-depth interviews that surface the ruling relations — texts, policies, and organizational discourses — that coordinate people's work and lives from outside their immediate standpoint. | Discourse analysis is a qualitative research methodology that examines how language, communication, and power shape meaning, identity, and social reality. Developed across linguistics, sociology, and psychology (particularly by Norman Fairclough and Jonathan Potter), discourse analysis goes beyond content to analyze language use as a social practice that constitutes and reflects power relations, ideologies, and social structures. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|