方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 暴力风险评估指南 (VRAG)× | SAPROF：保护因素暴力风险结构化评估× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 司法心理学 | 司法心理学 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 1993 | 2012 |
| 提出者≠ | Grant T. Harris, Marnie E. Rice, Vernon L. Quinsey | Vivienne de Vogel, Corine de Ruiter, Yvonne Bouman, Merike de Vries Robbé |
| 类型≠ | Clinician-rated / File-based | Clinician-rated |
| 开创性文献≠ | Harris, G. T., Rice, M. E., & Quinsey, V. L. (1993). Violent recidivism of mentally disordered offenders: The development of a statistical prediction instrument. Neuropsychiatry Neuropsychology and Behavioral Neurology, 6(4), 269–279. DOI ↗ | de Vogel, V., de Ruiter, C., Bouman, Y., & de Vries Robbé, M. (2012). SAPROF: Structured Assessment of Protective Factors for violence risk (Version 3). Forum Educatief. link ↗ |
| 别名 | VRAG, Harris-Rice-Quinsey VRAG | SAPROF, de Vogel SAPROF |
| 相关 | 4 | 4 |
| 摘要≠ | The Violence Risk Appraisal Guide (VRAG) is an actuarial instrument developed by Harris, Rice, and Quinsey (1993) to estimate the probability of violent recidivism among adult male offenders released from forensic psychiatric hospitals. It represents one of the earliest empirically validated violence prediction tools and remains widely used in correctional, forensic psychiatric, and civil commitment settings. The VRAG combines static historical variables with dynamic factors to generate a probability-based risk assessment. | The Structured Assessment of Protective Factors for Violence Risk (SAPROF) is a 17-item structured professional judgment tool developed by de Vogel, de Ruiter, Bouman, and colleagues (2012) to identify protective factors and strengths in individuals undergoing violence risk assessment. It complements risk assessment instruments (e.g., HCR-20v3) by systematically evaluating resilience, social support, motivation, and positive functioning—domains that mitigate violence risk and inform rehabilitation potential. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|