方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 逐字抄袭× | 释义抄袭× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 研究伦理 | 研究伦理 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 1950s | 1980s |
| 提出者 | Academic integrity framework (modern definition) | Academic integrity framework (modern definition) |
| 类型 | Concept | Concept |
| 开创性文献≠ | Council of Canadian Academies (2019). The state of science and technology in Canada. Ottawa: Council of Canadian Academies. link ↗ | Roig, M. (2015). Avoiding plagiarism, self-plagiarism, and other questionable writing practices: A guide to ethical writing. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Research Integrity. link ↗ |
| 别名 | direct plagiarism, copy-and-paste plagiarism, literal copying | insufficient paraphrase, close paraphrase, lazy paraphrasing |
| 相关 | 4 | 4 |
| 摘要≠ | Verbatim plagiarism is the most straightforward and recognizable form of academic misconduct: copying text word-for-word from a source without quotation marks, citation, or attribution. It is the most easily detected form of plagiarism and carries severe institutional and career consequences. | Paraphrasing plagiarism occurs when an author rewrites another's ideas in different words but does not cite the source. Unlike verbatim plagiarism (copying word-for-word), paraphrasing plagiarism involves changing vocabulary and sentence structure while retaining the original argument, logic, or conceptual content without attribution. It is harder to detect than direct copying but is still a clear violation of academic integrity. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|