ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

Value-Added Teacher Evaluation×Student Growth Percentiles×
领域EducationEducation
方法族Regression modelRegression model
起源年份20042009
提出者William Sanders (TVAAS); methodological critique by McCaffrey, Lockwood, Koretz et al.Damian W. Betebenner
类型Statistical estimation of individual teachers' contributions to student achievement growthNormative growth description via conditional quantile regression
开创性文献McCaffrey, D. F., Lockwood, J. R., Koretz, D., Louis, T. A., & Hamilton, L. (2004). Models for value-added modeling of teacher effects. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 29(1), 67–101. DOI ↗Betebenner, D. W. (2009). Norm- and criterion-referenced student growth. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 28(4), 42–51. DOI ↗
别名Teacher Value-Added Models, VAM for Teachers, Teacher Effect Estimation, Value-Added Teacher AccountabilitySGP, Conditional Status Percentiles, Betebenner Growth Percentiles, Quantile-Regression Growth Model
相关44
摘要Value-added teacher evaluation uses longitudinal student test scores to estimate how much individual teachers contribute to their students' achievement growth, net of what students brought into the classroom. Statistically it applies value-added and mixed-model machinery — controlling for prior achievement and student characteristics, then treating each teacher's residual contribution as an effect to be estimated. Pioneered in Tennessee's TVAAS and scrutinized in a large methodological and policy literature, it became central, and controversial, in teacher accountability.Student growth percentiles (SGPs) describe how much a student grew academically relative to peers with similar score histories. Introduced by Damian Betebenner in 2009, the method fits a series of conditional quantile regressions of a current test score on prior scores, then reports each student's growth as the percentile rank they occupy within the distribution of students who had the same starting point. A student at the 70th growth percentile grew faster than 70 percent of academic peers, regardless of their absolute achievement level.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Value-Added Teacher Evaluation · Student Growth Percentiles. 于 2026-06-25 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare